AOBPreview originally published online on August 6, 2007
Annals of Botany 2007 100(3):659-676; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm146
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floral Initiation and Inflorescence Architecture: A Comparative View

Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, CSIC-UPV, CPI, Ingeniero Fausto Elio, 46022 Valencia, Spain
* For correspondence. E-mail madueno{at}ibmcp.upv.es
Received: 10 March 2007 Returned for revision: 16 April 2007 Accepted: 15 June 2007 Published electronically: 16 August 2007
Background: A huge variety of plant forms can be found in nature. This is particularly noticeable for inflorescences, the region of the plant that contains the flowers. The architecture of the inflorescence depends on its branching pattern and on the relative position where flowers are formed. In model species such as Arabidopsis thaliana or Antirrhinum majus the key genes that regulate the initiation of flowers have been studied in detail and much is known about how they work. Studies being carried out in other species of higher plants indicate that the homologues of these genes are also key regulators of the development of their reproductive structures. Further, changes in these gene expression patterns and/or function play a crucial role in the generation of different plant architectures.
Scope: In this review we aim to present a summarized view on what is known about floral initiation genes in different plants, particularly dicotyledonous species, and aim to emphasize their contribution to plant architecture.
Key words: Plant architecture, inflorescence development, compound inflorescence, floral meristem identity, LEAFY, APETALA1, TERMINAL FLOWER1, legume, VEG1, DET
Present address: Laboratoire DRDC / PCV, UMR CEA – CNRS 5168 – INRA1200 – UJF CEA, 17 rue des Martyrs, bât. C2 – 38054 GRENOBLE Cedex 9, France
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. Rudall and R. M. Bateman Defining the limits of flowers: the challenge of distinguishing between the evolutionary products of simple versus compound strobili Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2010; 365(1539): 397 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, Z. Thong, and H. Yu Coming into bloom: the specification of floral meristems Development, October 15, 2009; 136(20): 3379 - 3391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Weller, V. Hecht, L. C. Liew, F. C. Sussmilch, B. Wenden, C. L. Knowles, and J. K. Vander Schoor Update on the genetic control of flowering in garden pea J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(9): 2493 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Md. R. Karim, A. Hirota, D. Kwiatkowska, M. Tasaka, and M. Aida A Role for Arabidopsis PUCHI in Floral Meristem Identity and Bract Suppression PLANT CELL, May 1, 2009; 21(5): 1360 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Rudall, M. V. Remizowa, G. Prenner, C. J. Prychid, R. E. Tuckett, and D. D. Sokoloff Nonflowers near the base of extant angiosperms? Spatiotemporal arrangement of organs in reproductive units of Hydatellaceae and its bearing on the origin of the flower Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 67 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Souer, A. B. Rebocho, M. Bliek, E. Kusters, R. A.M. de Bruin, and R. Koes Patterning of Inflorescences and Flowers by the F-Box Protein DOUBLE TOP and the LEAFY Homolog ABERRANT LEAF AND FLOWER of Petunia PLANT CELL, August 1, 2008; 20(8): 2033 - 2048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2007 J. Exp. Bot., July 18, 2008; (2008) ern109v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Scutt, G. Theissen, and C. Ferrandiz The Evolution of Plant Development: Past, Present and Future: Preface Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 599 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





