Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2007 100(5):991-998; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ehdaie, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ehdaie, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ehdaie, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© 2007 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Domestication and Crop Physiology: Roots of Green-Revolution Wheat

J. Giles Waines* and Bahman Ehdaie

Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124, USA

* For correspondence. E-mail giles.waines{at}ucr.edu

Received: 15 February 2007    Returned for revision: 26 April 2007    Accepted: 6 July 2007   

Background and Aims: Most plant scientists, in contrast to animal scientists, study only half the organism, namely above-ground stems, leaves, flowers and fruits, and neglect below-ground roots. Yet all acknowledge roots are important for anchorage, water and nutrient uptake, and presumably components of yield. This paper investigates the relationship between domestication, and the root systems of landraces, and the parents of early, mid- and late green-revolution bread wheat cultivars. It compares the root system of bread wheat and ‘Veery’-type wheat containing the 1RS translocation from rye.

Methods: Wheat germplasm was grown in large pots in sand culture in replicated experiments. This allowed roots to be washed free to study root characters.

Key Results: The three bread wheat parents of early green-revolution wheats have root biomass less than two-thirds the mean of some landrace wheats. Crossing early green-revolution wheat to an F2 of ‘Norin 10’ and ‘Brevor’, further reduced root biomass in mid-generation semi-dwarf and dwarf wheats. Later-generation semi-dwarf wheats show genetic variation for root biomass, but some exhibit further reduction in root size. This is so for some California and UK wheats. The wheat–rye translocation in ‘Kavkaz’ for the short arm of chromosome 1 (1RS) increased root biomass and branching in cultivars that contained it.

Conclusions: Root size of modern cultivars is small compared with that of landraces. Their root system may be too small for optimum uptake of water and nutrients and maximum grain yield. Optimum root size for grain yield has not been investigated in wheat or most crop plants. Use of 1RS and similar alien translocations may increase root biomass and grain yield significantly in irrigated and rain-fed conditions. Root characters may be integrated into components of yield analysis in wheat. Plant breeders may need to select directly for root characters.

Key words: Root biomass, root branching, unconscious selection, Triticum, Mexican wheat, breeding, ‘Veery’ wheat, wheat–rye translocation, 1RS translocation, components of grain yield


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. P. Whitmore and W. R. Whalley
Physical effects of soil drying on roots and crop growth
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2009; 60(10): 2845 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. W. Lawlor
Musings about the effects of environment on photosynthesis
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(4): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. A. Vaughan, E. Balazs, and J. S. Heslop-Harrison
From Crop Domestication to Super-domestication
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(5): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.