Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on January 24, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 101(6):759-766; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm321
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/6/759    most recent
mcm321v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Genome Size Scaling through Phenotype Space

Charles A. Knight* and Jeremy M. Beaulieu

California Polytechnic State University, Department of Biological Sciences, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA

* For correspondence. Email knight{at}calpoly.edu

Received: 28 June 2007    Returned for revision: 24 August 2007    Accepted: 13 November 2007    Published electronically: 24 January 2008

Background and Aims: Early observations that genome size was positively correlated with cell size formed the basis of hypothesized consequences of genome size variation at higher phenotypic scales. This scaling was supported by several studies showing a positive relationship between genome size and seed mass, and various metrics of growth and leaf morphology. However, many of these studies were undertaken with limited species sets, and often performed within a single genus. Here we seek to generalize the relationship between genome size and the phenotype by examining eight phenotypic traits using large cross-species comparisons involving diverse assemblages of angiosperm and gymnosperm species. These analyses are presented in order of increasing scale (roughly equating to the number of cells required to produce a particular phenotypic trait), following the order of: cell size (guard cell and epidermal), stomatal density, seed mass, leaf mass per unit area (LMA), wood density, photosynthetic rate and finally maximum plant height.

Scope: The results show that genome size is a strong predictor of phenotypic traits at the cellular level (guard cell length and epidermal cell area had significant positive relationships with genome size). Stomatal density decreased with increasing genome size, but this did not lead to decreased photosynthetic rate. At higher phenotypic scales, the predictive power of genome size generally diminishes (genome size had weak predictive power for both LMA and seed mass), except in the interesting case of maximum plant height (tree species tend to have small genomes). There was no relationship with wood density. The general observation that species with larger genome size have larger seed mass was supported; however, species with small genome size can also have large seed masses. All of these analyses involved robust comparative methods that incorporate the phylogenetic relationships of species.

Conclusions: Genome size correlations are quite strong at the cellular level but decrease in predictive power with increasing phenotypic scale. Our hope is that these results may lead to new mechanistic hypotheses about why genome size scaling exists at the cellular level, and why nucleotypic consequences diminish at higher phenotypic scales.

Key words: Genome size, cell size, stomata density, guard cell, LMA, photosynthesis, scaling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2008 101: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Lavergne, N. J. Muenke, and J. Molofsky
Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2010; 105(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. J. Leitch, I. Kahandawala, J. Suda, L. Hanson, M. J. Ingrouille, M. W. Chase, and M. F. Fay
Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2009; 104(3): 469 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Anssour, T. Krugel, T. F. Sharbel, H. P. Saluz, G. Bonaventure, and I. T. Baldwin
Phenotypic, genetic and genomic consequences of natural and synthetic polyploidization of Nicotiana attenuata and Nicotiana obtusifolia
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(8): 1207 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. J. Leitch and M. F. Fay
Plant Genome Horizons: Michael Bennett's Contribution to Genome Research
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 737 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.