Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on March 30, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 101(7):941-956; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn032
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/7/941    most recent
mcn032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudall, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sokoloff, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudall, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sokoloff, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rudall, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sokoloff, D. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparative Ovule and Megagametophyte Development in Hydatellaceae and Water Lilies Reveal a Mosaic of Features Among the Earliest Angiosperms

Paula J. Rudall1,*, Margarita V. Remizowa2, Anton S. Beer2, Elizabeth Bradshaw1, Dennis W. Stevenson3, Terry D. Macfarlane4, Renee E. Tuckett5, Shrirang R. Yadav6 and Dmitry D. Sokoloff2

1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK
2 Department of Higher Plants, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3 New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458, USA
4 Western Australian Herbarium, Science Division, Department of Environment & Conservation, Brain Street, 6258 Manjimup, WA, Australia
5 The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009 and Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Fraser Avenue, West Perth, WA 6005, Australia
6 Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur 416 004, India

* For correspondence. E-mail p.rudall{at}kew.org

Received: 29 November 2007    Returned for revision: 10 January 2008    Accepted: 12 February 2008    Published electronically: 30 March 2008

Background and Aims: The embryo sac, nucellus and integuments of the early-divergent angiosperms Hydatellaceae and other Nymphaeales are compared with those of other seed plants, in order to evaluate the evolutionary origin of these characters in the angiosperms.

Methods: Using light microscopy, ovule and embryo sac development are described in five (of 12) species of Trithuria, the sole genus of Hydatellaceae, and compared with those of Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae.

Key Results: The ovule of Trithuria is bitegmic and tenuinucellate, rather than bitegmic and crassinucellate as in most other Nymphaeales. The seed is operculate and possesses a perisperm that develops precociously, which are both key features of Nymphaeales. However, in the Indian species T. konkanensis, perisperm is relatively poorly developed by the time of fertilization. Perisperm cells in Trithuria become multinucleate during development, a feature observed also in other Nymphaeales. The outer integument is semi-annular (‘hood-shaped’), as in Cabombaceae and some Nymphaeaceae, in contrast to the annular (‘cap-shaped’) outer integument of some other Nymphaeaceae (e.g. Barclaya) and Amborella. The megagametophyte in Trithuria is monosporic and four-nucleate; at the two-nucleate stage both nuclei occur in the micropylar domain. Double megagametophytes were frequently observed, probably developed from different megaspores of the same tetrad. Indirect, but strong evidence is presented for apomictic embryo development in T. filamentosa.

Conclusions: Most features of the ovule and embryo sac of Trithuria are consistent with a close relationship with other Nymphaeales, especially Cabombaceae. The frequent occurrence of double megagametophytes in the same ovule indicates a high degree of developmental flexibility, and could provide a clue to the evolutionary origin of the Polygonum-type of angiosperm embryo sac.

Key words: Embryo sac, megagametophyte, ovule, Hydatellaceae, Trithuria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2008 101: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. J. Rudall and R. M. Bateman
Defining the limits of flowers: the challenge of distinguishing between the evolutionary products of simple versus compound strobili
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2010; 365(1539): 397 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Lora, J. I. Hormaza, and M. Herrero
The progamic phase of an early-divergent angiosperm, Annona cherimola (Annonaceae)
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2010; 105(2): 221 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. J. Rudall, T. Eldridge, J. Tratt, M. M. Ramsay, R. E. Tuckett, S. Y. Smith, M. E. Collinson, M. V. Remizowa, and D. D. Sokoloff
Seed fertilization, development, and germination in Hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales): Implications for endosperm evolution in early angiosperms
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2009; 96(9): 1581 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey
Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2008
J. Exp. Bot., June 23, 2009; (2009) erp154v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. K. Endress and J. A. Doyle
Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 22 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. S. Soltis, S. F. Brockington, M.-J. Yoo, A. Piedrahita, M. Latvis, M. J. Moore, A. S. Chanderbali, and D. E. Soltis
Floral variation and floral genetics in basal angiosperms
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 110 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. J. Rudall, M. V. Remizowa, G. Prenner, C. J. Prychid, R. E. Tuckett, and D. D. Sokoloff
Nonflowers near the base of extant angiosperms? Spatiotemporal arrangement of organs in reproductive units of Hydatellaceae and its bearing on the origin of the flower
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 67 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. H. Williams
Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae) and the evolutionary developmental origins of the angiosperm progamic phase
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 144 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. E. Friedman and K. C. Ryerson
Reconstructing the ancestral female gametophyte of angiosperms: Insights from Amborella and other ancient lineages of flowering plants
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 129 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. W. Graham and W. J. D. Iles
Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 216 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.