Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on January 16, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 101(8):1195-1206; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/8/1195    most recent
mcm317v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Q.
Right arrow Articles by de Reffye, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Q.
Right arrow Articles by de Reffye, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Q.
Right arrow Articles by de Reffye, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Does the Structure–Function Model GREENLAB Deal with Crop Phenotypic Plasticity Induced by Plant Spacing? A Case Study on Tomato

Qiaoxue Dong1,{dagger}, Gaëtan Louarn1,2,{dagger},*, Yiming Wang1, Jean-Francois Barczi3 and Philippe de Reffye3,4

1 China Agricultural University, Department of Electronic Information, College of Information and Electrical Engineering, Box 63, 100083, Beijing, China
2 Institute of Automation (CASIA), Sino-French Laboratory of Informatics, Automation and Applied Mathematics (LIAMA), Chinese Academy of Science, PO Box 2728, 100080, Beijing, China
3 CIRAD, UMR AMAP, TA 40/PS2, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
4 INRIA Rocquencourt, Digiplant Program, 78153, Le Chesnay Cedex, France

* For correspondence. E-mail gaetan.louarn{at}mons.inra.fr

Received: 21 June 2007    Returned for revision: 27 September 2007    Accepted: 21 November 2007    Published electronically: 16 January 2008

Background and Aims: Plant growth models able to simulate phenotypic plasticity are increasingly required because (1) they should enable better predictions of the observed variations in crop production, yield and quality, and (2) their parameters are expected to have a more robust genetic basis, with possible implications for selection of quantitative traits such as growth- and allocation-related processes. The structure–function plant model, GREENLAB, simulates resource-dependent plasticity of plant architecture. Evidence for its generality has been previously reported, but always for plants grown in a limited range of environments. This paper aims to test the model concept to its limits by using plant spacing as a means to generate a gradient of competition for light, and by using a new crop species, tomato, known to exhibit a strong photomorphogenetic response.

Methods: A greenhouse experiment was carried out with three homogeneous planting densities (plant spacing = 0·3, 0·6 and 1 m). Detailed records of plant development, plant architecture and organ growth were made throughout the growing period. Model calibration was performed for each situation using a statistical optimization procedure (multi-fitting).

Key Results and Conclusions: Obvious limitations of the present version of the model appeared to account fully for the plant plasticity induced by inter-plant competition for light. A lack of stability was identified for some model parameters at very high planting density. In particular, those parameters characterizing organ sink strengths and governing light interception proved to be environment-dependent. Remarkably, however, responses of the parameter values concerned were consistent with actual growth measurements and with previously reported results. Furthermore, modifications of total biomass production and of allocation patterns induced by the planting-density treatments were accurately simulated using the sets of optimized parameters. These results demonstrate that the overall model structure is potentially able to reproduce the observed plant plasticity and suggest that sound biologically based adaptations could overcome the present model limitations. Potential options for model improvement are proposed, and the possibility of using the kernel algorithm currently available as a fitting tool to build up more sophisticated model versions is advocated.

Key words: Functional–structural models, GREENLAB, phenotypic plasticity, planting density, competition, source–sink relationship, parameter stability, Solanum lycopersicum


{dagger} These two authors contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2008 101: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J.-F. Barczi, H. Rey, Y. Caraglio, P. de Reffye, D. Barthelemy, Q. X. Dong, and T. Fourcaud
AmapSim: A Structural Whole-plant Simulator Based on Botanical Knowledge and Designed to Host External Functional Models
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1125 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P.-H. Cournede, A. Mathieu, F. Houllier, D. Barthelemy, and P. de Reffye
Computing Competition for Light in the GREENLAB Model of Plant Growth: A Contribution to the Study of the Effects of Density on Resource Acquisition and Architectural Development
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1207 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. Fourcaud, X. Zhang, A. Stokes, H. Lambers, and C. Korner
Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1053 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.