Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on September 5, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 102(5):855-863; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn164
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/5/855    most recent
mcn164v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gugerli, F.
Right arrow Articles by Holderegger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gugerli, F.
Right arrow Articles by Holderegger, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gugerli, F.
Right arrow Articles by Holderegger, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Utility of Multilocus Genotypes for Taxon Assignment in Stands of Closely Related European White Oaks from Switzerland

Felix Gugerli*, Sabine Brodbeck and Rolf Holderegger

WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Ecological Genetics and Evolution, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland

* For correspondence. E-mail gugerli{at}wsl.ch

Received: 22 April 2008    Returned for revision: 4 June 2008    Accepted: 4 August 2008    Published electronically: 5 September 2008

Background and Aims: European white oaks (Quercus petraea, Q. pubescens, Q. robur) have long puzzled plant biologists owing to disputed species differentiation. Extensive hybridization or shared ancestry have been proposed as alternative hypotheses to explain why genetic differentiation between these oak species is low. Species delimitation is usually weak and often shows gradual transitions in leaf morphology. Hence, individual identification may be difficult, but remains a critical step for both scientific work and practical management.

Methods: Multilocus genotype data (five nuclear microsatellites) were used from ten Swiss oak stands for taxon identification without a priori grouping of individuals or populations, using model-based Bayesian assignment tests.

Key Results: Three groups best structured the data, indicating that the taxonomical signal was stronger than the spatial signal. Most individuals showed high posterior probabilities for either of three genetic groups that were best circumscribed as taxonomical units. The assignment of a subset of trees, whose taxonomic status had been previously characterized in detail, supported this classification scheme.

Conclusions: Molecular-genetic assignment tests are useful in the identification of species status in critical taxon complexes such as the European white oaks. Such an approach is of practical importance for forest management, e.g. for stand certification or in seed trade to trace the origin of forest products.

Key words: Assignment test, Bayesian inference, multilocus genotype, nuclear microsatellites, Quercus sp., species complex


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2008 102: NP. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. M. Penaloza-Ramirez, A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, L. Mendoza-Cuenca, H. Caron, A. Kremer, and K. Oyama
Interspecific gene flow in a multispecies oak hybrid zone in the Sierra Tarahumara of Mexico
Ann. Bot., January 6, 2010; (2010) mcp301v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.