Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on March 20, 2009
Annals of Botany 2009 103(9):1403-1413; doi:10.1093/aob/mcp062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/9/1403    most recent
mcp062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Karron, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Annals of Botany issue: Special Issue: Plant-Pollinator Interactions [View the issue table of contents]

New frontiers in competition for pollination

Randall J. Mitchell1,*, Rebecca J. Flanagan2, Beverly J. Brown3, Nickolas M. Waser4,5 and Jeffrey D. Karron2

1 Department of Biology, Program in Integrated Biosciences, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
3 Department of Biology, Nazareth College, Rochester, NY 14618, USA
4 Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
5 School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

* For correspondence: E-mail: rjm2{at}uakron.edu

Received: 31 October 2008    Returned for revision: 13 January 2009    Accepted: 6 February 2009    Published electronically: 20 March 2009

Background: Co-flowering plant species frequently share pollinators. Pollinator sharing is often detrimental to one or more of these species, leading to competition for pollination. Perhaps because it offers an intriguing juxtaposition of ecological opposites – mutualism and competition – within one relatively tractable system, competition for pollination has captured the interest of ecologists for over a century.

Scope: Our intent is to contemplate exciting areas for further work on competition for pollination, rather than to exhaustively review past studies. After a brief historical summary, we present a conceptual framework that incorporates many aspects of competition for pollination, involving both the quantity and quality of pollination services, and both female and male sex functions of flowers. Using this framework, we contemplate a relatively subtle mechanism of competition involving pollen loss, and consider how competition might affect plant mating systems, overall reproductive success and multi-species interactions. We next consider how competition for pollination might be altered by several emerging consequences of a changing planet, including the spread of alien species, climate change and pollinator declines. Most of these topics represent new frontiers whose exploration has just begun.

Conclusions: Competition for pollination has served as a model for the integration of ecological and evolutionary perspectives in the study of species interactions. Its study has elucidated both obvious and more subtle mechanisms, and has documented a range of outcomes. However, the potential for this interaction to inform our understanding of both pure and applied aspects of pollination biology has only begun to be realized.

Key words: Alien plants, climate change, competition for pollination, facilitation, mating system, mechanism, Lythrum, Mimulus, pollinator visitation, sexual function, invasive species, pollen loss


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2009 103: i. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
L. D. Harder and M. A. Aizen
Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2010; 365(1539): 529 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
R. J. Mitchell, R. E. Irwin, R. J. Flanagan, and J. D. Karron
Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.