Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on April 28, 2009
Annals of Botany 2009 104(1):115-124; doi:10.1093/aob/mcp100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow ContentSelect
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/115    most recent
mcp100v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ageing effects in an iteroparous plant species with a variable life span

Henk Van Dijk*

Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8016, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France

* For correspondence. E-mail henk.van-dijk{at}univ-lille1.fr

Received: 10 December 2008    Returned for revision: 10 February 2009    Accepted: 24 March 2009    Published electronically: 28 April 2009

Background and Aims: Ageing effects may be due to dysfunction leading to decreasing reproduction and survival with age. In plants, however, other (physiological) causes, associated with size for example, may also play a role. Iteroparous plants with genetically variable life spans can be helpful in unravelling these two aspects of changes associated with growing older.

Methods: In a long-term experiment, Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet) plants from the same set of populations but with different ages were compared for flowering date over several years. Flowering date, root growth and seed production were measured in a synthetic population and in progenies derived from reciprocal crosses over three consecutive years and analysed with respect to the number of years yet to live. Heritabilities of these three characters and of life span were estimated.

Key Results: Flowering occurred on average 1·3 d later each year over a plant's whole lifetime. In the year before dying, plants flowered on average 3·3 d later and both root investment and seed production decreased significantly compared with plants that remained alive for at least 1 further year. The negative relationship (trade-off) between reproduction and root investment in early life became positive near the end of life, and the positive relationship between flowering date and root growth became negative.

Conclusions: Effects of ageing – in the sense of a decline in reproduction and root storage – combined with later flowering were particularly pronounced in the year before death. The gradual change in flowering phenology, observed over the whole lifetime, could have a physiological basis unrelated to dysfunction.

Key words: Ageing, Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (sea beet), flowering phenology, longevity, perennial, root investment, seed production, trade-offs, whole-plant senescence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2009 104: i. [Extract] [Full Text]  

John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles
J. A. Bryant
Ann Bot 2009 104: iii. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.