Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on September 22, 2009
Annals of Botany 2009 104(6):1207-1216; doi:10.1093/aob/mcp229
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/6/1207    most recent
mcp229v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera-Bosquet, L.
Right arrow Articles by Araus, J. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera-Bosquet, L.
Right arrow Articles by Araus, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera-Bosquet, L.
Right arrow Articles by Araus, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How yield relates to ash content, {Delta}13C and {Delta}18O in maize grown under different water regimes

Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet1,2, Ciro Sánchez2 and José Luis Araus2,*

1 Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batán, Texcoco, CP 56130, Mexico

* For correspondence. E-mail j.araus{at}cgiar.org

Received: 14 May 2009    Returned for revision: 17 June 2009    Accepted: 24 July 2009    Published electronically: 22 September 2009

Background and Aims: Stable isotopes have proved a valuable phenotyping tool when breeding for yield potential and drought adaptation; however, the cost and technical skills involved in isotope analysis limit its large-scale application in breeding programmes. This is particularly so for {Delta}18O despite the potential relevance of this trait in C4 crops. The accumulation of minerals (measured as ash content) has been proposed as an inexpensive way to evaluate drought adaptation and yield in C3 cereals, but little is known of the usefulness of this measure in C4 cereals such as maize (Zea mays). The present study investigates how yield relates to ash content, {Delta}13C and {Delta}18O, and evaluates the use of ash content as an alternative or complementary criterion to stable isotopes in assessing yield potential and drought resistance in maize.

Methods: A set of tropical maize hybrids developed by CIMMYT were subjected to different water availabilities, in order to induce water stress during the reproductive stages under field conditions. Ash content and {Delta}13C were determined in leaves and kernels. In addition, {Delta}18O was measured in kernels.

Key Results: Water regime significantly affected yield, ash content and stable isotopes. The results revealed a close relationship between ash content in leaves and the traits informing about plant water status. Ash content in kernels appeared to reflect differences in sink–source balance. Genotypic variation in grain yield was mainly explained by the combination of ash content and {Delta}18O, whilst {Delta}13C did not explain a significant percentage of such variation.

Conclusions: Ash content in leaves and kernels proved a useful alternative or complementary criterion to {Delta}18O in kernels for assessing yield performance in maize grown under drought conditions.

Key words: Ash content, {Delta}13C, {Delta}18O, Zea mays, water stress, drought resistance, grain yield


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

ContentSnapshots

Ann Bot 2009 104: i. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.