Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BIRD, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by RUCK, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BIRD, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by RUCK, H. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BIRD, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by RUCK, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 20: 553-562, 1956
© 1956 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Comparative Physiology of Apple Rootstocks

II. The Effect of pH and Aeration on the Growth of Malling Apple Rootstocks in Water Cultures

I. F. BIRD and H. C. RUCK

Research Institute of Plant Physiology, Imperial College London

Three Malling apple rootstocks, M.IX, M.II, and M.XVI, were grown in aerated and non-aerated nutrient solutions at pH 3·6, 4·0, and 5·5, and their growth and survival compared with rootstocks grown in sand and in soil. No plants survived in the non-aerated cultures due to severe bacterial and fungal attack on the roots. In the aerated series a marked difference in susceptibility of rootstocks to root infection was found, M.XVI being considerably more resistant than M.II or M.IX. More rootstocks survived at the lower pH's (4·0 and 3·6) but among surviving plants of M.XVI growth was much less than at pH 5·5. It would appear therefore that factors making for survival do not of necessity make for optimum growth. In sand and soil cultures all plants survived.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.