Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALLISON, J. C. S.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ALLISON, J. C. S.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ALLISON, J. C. S.
Right arrow Articles by WATSON, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 30: 365-381, 1966
© 1966 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

The Production and Distribution of Dry Matter in Maize after Flowering

J. C. S. ALLISON and D. J. WATSON

Department of Agriculture, University College of Rhodesia Nyataland, Salisbury, Rhodesia
Rothamsted Experimental Station Harpenden, Herts

An experiment in which different groups of leaf laminae were removed, or ears shaded, shortly after silking showed that most of the dry-matter increase after flowering was produced by upper leaves. The top five, the middle four, and the bottom six laminae accounted, respectively, for 26 per cent, 42 per cent, and 32 per cent of the leaf area duration (D) of the laminae after flowering; the estimated contributions of the three groups to dry-matter production by the laminae after flowering were about 40 per cent, 35–50 per cent, and 5–25 per cent, respectively. The sheaths provided about one-fifth of the total leaf area and probably contributed about one-fifth, and laminae four-fifths, of the total dry matter produced after flowering. The contribution from photosynthesis by the ear was negligible, presumably because its surface area was only 2 per cent of that of the leaves. Leaf efficiency (dry matter produced per unit area) decreased greatly from the top to the base of the shoot. When laminae were removed, the grain received a larger fraction of the dry matter accumulated after flowering, less dry matter remained in the stem, and the photosynthetic efficiency of the remaining leaves was apparently increased.

When alternate laminae were removed at the time of silking (half-defoliation) D was decreased by 40 per cent, and the subsequent production of dry matter decreased nearly proportionately, so that net assimilation rate (E) was not affected but grain dry weight was decreased by only 32 per cent. At the final harvest, the grain of half-defoliated plants constituted 80 per cent of the dry matter accumulated after flowering, compared with 65 per cent for intact plants. Stem weight decreased from two weeks after flowering in half-defoliated plants, but remained nearly constant in intact plants. When pollination was prevented and no grains formed, E during the first month after flowering was unaffected; the dry matter that would have passed into the grain accumulated in the stem and husks, not in the leaves.

The decrease in stem weight caused by defoliation suggests that previously stored dry matter was moved to the grain. That such movement is possible was shown by keeping prematurely harvested shoots in the dark for two weeks with their cut ends in water; the dry weight of the grain increased and that of the stem, laminae, husks, and core decreased. Nevertheless, dry-matter production after flowering was more than sufficient for grain growth, and previous photosynthesis probably contributed little to the grain.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. M. Hashemi, S. J. Herbert, and D. H. Putnam
Yield Response of Corn to Crowding Stress
Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.