Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 30: 753-761, 1966
© 1966 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Effect of Temperature on Net Assimilation Rate

J. WARREN WILSON1

Division of Plant Industry C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, Australia

Net assimilation rates and other growth attributes were compared for rape, sunflower, and maize plants growing widely spaced at temperatures of 10°, 16°, 22°, 28°, and 34° C, in light of 3, 000 f.c. intensity.

The optimum temperature for net assimilation rate lay between 20° and 30° C, and was lowest for rape and highest for maize. The temperature coefficient of the net assimilation rate was lower than that of the relative growth-rate, especially in rape and sunflower, corresponding to an increase in leaf-area ratio with in temperature. This arose to an increase in leaf-area ratio with rise in temperature. This mcrease arose through change inleafarea/leaf weight; temperature had little effect on leaf weight/plant weight.

In moderate to warm conditions the net assimilation rate varied little with temperature: by only± 10 per cent between 12° and 30° C for rape, and 23° and 36° C for maize. This agrees with observations in natural climates which suggest that temperature is generally less important than light in controlling net assimilation rates, except in cool climates. In natural climates, as in these controlled climates, relative growth-rate is more temperature-dependent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Ehleringer and I. Forseth
Solar Tracking by Plants
Science, December 5, 1980; 210(4474): 1094 - 1098.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.