Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REES, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by REES, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by REES, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 35: 43-55, 1971
© 1971 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Factors Affecting the Growth of Daughter Bulbs in the Tulip

A. R. REES

Glasshouse Crops Research Institute Littlehampton, Sussex

Received: 30 March 1970   

The relative growth rate (Rw) of daughter bulbs of the tulip cultivar Rose Copland was remarkably constant during the spring period of growth in four seasons at two sites. The Q10 of Rw was 2.2, and the long period of constant Rw is attributed to compensation of a fall with age by increasing temperatures in the spring. Final bulb weight differed among four cultivars because of differences in Rw and in initial daughter bulb weights.

Partial defoliation reduced Rw roughly in proportion to the leaf area removed, and removal of mother bulb scales resulted in reduced leaf area, fewer daughter bulbs, and a lower daughter bulb Rw. Heat-treatment of mother bulbs before planting (blindstoken) killed the flower within the bulb, inactivated the apical dominance exerted by the flower, and resulted in a higher initial daughter-bulb weight at the start of the spring period of exponential growth. The Rw of heat-treated and control daughter bulbs were not different, neither were the leaf areas, so it is assumed that final daughter-bulb weights were higher following treatment because of increased sink strength. The economic implications of these findings are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.