Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTS, J.
Right arrow Articles by WAREING, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTS, J.
Right arrow Articles by WAREING, P. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTS, J.
Right arrow Articles by WAREING, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 39: 311-324, 1975
© 1975 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

An Examination of the Differences in Dry Matter Production shown by Some Progenies of Pinus sylvestris L.

J. ROBERTS and P. F. WAREING

Department of Botany and Microbiology, University College of Wales Aberystwyth, SY2 3DA

Received: 5 June 1974   

A study was carried out to determine the extent of the variation in growth rate between several selected progenies of Scots pine {Pinus sylvestris L.) and the physiological characteristics underlying such variation, using growth analysis and direct measurement of photosynthetic rates. Differences in relative growth rate (RGR) could be demonstrated for first and second year seedling progenies, and these largely reflected differences in net assimilation rate (NAR). The relative performance of the progenies in different experiments was not always the same, although the highest RGR was shown by the same progeny in both first-year and second-year seedlings. For most progenies the observations were extended to 14-year-old trees growing in field trials established by the Forestry Commission. Comparisons of the relative height growth rates (RHGR) of these trees showed no significant differences between the progenies, apparently because the growth rates were limited by the site conditions. Thus, the size differences at the end of the fourteenth year probably still reflected differences in RGR which occurred during the seedling stages in the nursery. The significance of these observations for the assessment of performance in tree breeding programmes is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.