Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHALMERS, D. J
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN ENDE, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CHALMERS, D. J
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN ENDE, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by CHALMERS, D. J
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN ENDE, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 39: 423-432, 1975
© 1975 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Productivity of Peach Trees: Factors Affecting Dry-weight Distribution During Tree Growth

D. J CHALMERS and B. VAN DEN ENDE

Horticultural Research Station, Department of Agriculture Tatura, Victoria, Australia

Received: 8 July 1974   

The distribution of d.wt in peach trees varies greatly with increasing tree size or age. The growth of the fruit, roots and tree frame is competitively inter-related throughout the life of the tree while the growth of leaves and the annual shoots that support them is independent and increases in direct proportion to tree size. The proportion of the annual increment of d.wt directed into fruit growth increases from less than 30 per cent in a young tree of about 16 cm butt-circumference to almost 70 per cent in a mature tree of about 55 cm butt-circumference. Thereafter the proportion of d.wt allocated to fruit growth did not increase, although the total yield of d.wt continued to increase exponentially. Conversely the proportion of d.wt allocated to the frame and roots declined from just under 40 and 20 per cent respectively to less than 10 and 1 per cent respectively. In these organs also, the proportions did not change further for larger trees.

The ratio of vegetative growth made by the top of the tree compared to root growth increased from 1 in a young tree to 4 in the oldest trees but there was a strong allometric relation (r=0·99) between the growth of both systems. The physiological implications of these data and their relation to horticultural productivity are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.