Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PENNY, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by LOVELL, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PENNY, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by LOVELL, P. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by PENNY, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by LOVELL, P. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 40: 815-824, 1976
© 1976 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

The Effects of Inhibition of Cotyledon Photosynthesis on Seedling Development in Cucumis sativus L.

M. G. PENNY1, K. G. MOORE2 and P. H. LOVELL3

School of Plant Biology, University College of North Wales Bangor, Gwynedd, U.K.

Received: 10 October 1975   

The period during which cucumber cotyledons function purely as storage organs is very brief and this role is supplemented and superseded shortly after emergence by their photosynthetic function. Inhibition of cotyledon photosynthesis by DCMU during the early post emergence phase prevented further plumule development although some cotyledon expansion still took place before seedling death occurred. Seedlings did not survive DCMU application to the cotyledons if the treatment was made before the first leaf was expanded.

Reduction of the incident light intensity at the cotyledon surface to about 10 per cent of the control reduced the rate of growth of the seedlings but they did not die. Shading one cotyledon substantially reduced the weight and area of that cotyledon and of the seedling as a whole. There was little indication that the untreated cotyledon either increased its photosynthetic rate or its output of photosynthate-nor did it supply the inhibited cotyledon with assimilates. There was some indication that sucrose applied to the cotyledon surface was able to compensate for light to a small extent especially when only one cotyledon was shaded. However, in full light, sucrose tended to be inhibitory.

After emergence cotyledon reserves are sufficient only for limited cotyledon development. Survival and growth of the seedling beyond this stage is dependent upon cotyledon photosynthesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.