Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SUMMERFIELD, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by DE VRIES, F. W. T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SUMMERFIELD, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by DE VRIES, F. W. T. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by SUMMERFIELD, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by DE VRIES, F. W. T. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 69: 101-112, 1992
© 1992 Annals of Botany Company


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Photothermal Responses of Flowering in Rice (Oryza sativa)

R. J. SUMMERFIELD, S. T. COLLINSON, R. H. ELLIS, E. H. ROBERTS and F. W. T. PENNING DE VRIES*

Plant Environment Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AD, UK
* International Rice Research Institute P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines

Accepted: 31 July 1991   

Durations from sowing to panicle emergence in 16 diverse genotypes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) were recorded in 13 different photothermal regimes, comprising constant and diurnally alternating temperatures between 16 and 32 °C and photoperiods between 10.5 and 15.0 h d–1—all provided by controlled-environment growth cabinets. In 11.5 h days and at sub-optimal temperatures, relations between the rate of progress towards panicle emergence and mean temperature were linear in all genotypes, and amongst these the base temperature at that photoperiod varied between 6.6 and 11.9 °C. In most cases progress was most rapid at 24–26 °C, i.e. the optimum temperature was much cooler than expected from previously published values of times to panicle emergence in a less extensive range of photothermal regimes. Only in three cultivars was it warmer than 28 °C, and in these there were sufficient data to establish that relations between rates of progress to panicle emergence and photoperiod in the diurnally alternating temperature regime of 28–20 °C are also linear. Also, the responses of these three cultivars provide no evidence of any interaction between the effects of photoperiod and temperature. We conclude, then, that the model in which rate of development is a linear function of both temperature and photoperiod with no interaction, which has been shown to be common to many other species, also applies to rice. Differences among genotypes in relative sensitivity of rate of progress towards panicle emergence to both temperature and to photoperiod were considerable; japonica cultivars tended to be more sensitive to temperature and less sensitive to photoperiod than indica cultivars. Four indica cultivars bred and selected at The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines did not differ (P > 0.10) in their relations between rate of progress towards panicle emergence and sub-optimal temperatures in a daylength of 11.5 h, but the optimum temperature for cv. IR 36 was appreciably warmer than that for the cvs IR 5, IR 8 and IR 42.

Oryza sativa, rice, flowering, temperature, photoperiod, photothermal responses


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. W. Sylvester, V. Parker-Clark, and G. A. Murray
Leaf shape and anatomy as indicators of phase change in the grasses: comparison of maize, rice, and bluegrass
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2001; 88(12): 2157 - 2167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.