Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewar, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dewar, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dewar, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 71: 147-159, 1993
© 1993 Annals of Botany Company

A Mechanistic Analysis of Self-thinning in Terms of the Carbon Balance of Trees

Roderick C. Dewar

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Edinburgh Research Station, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK

The self-thinning behavior of a monoculture forest is examined from a mechanistic viewpoint, in terms of the carbon balance of trees at the stand level. Two approaches are described: the first is based on simple assumptions concerning the balance between growth, photosynthesis and respiration; the second uses the process-based I.T.E. EDINBURGH FOREST model, extended to include tree birth and death, to examined the assumptions of the first approach at a more mechanistic level and to interpret the observed variation in the responses to shading and soil fertility in terms of a single model.

The first approach leads to a power law relation m {propto} n -1/y between mean biomass per tree (m) and the number of trees per unit ground area (n), where y is the exponent characterising the rate at which respiration (r) scales with biomass (i.e. r {propto} my). For values of y less than 1, m and n are predicted to increase and decrease, respectively, as powers of time (t) such that the biomass per unit ground area (M) increases linearly with t for any value of y. When y equals 1, m and n vary exponentially with t and M remains constant.

When r is assumed to be proportional to stem cambium surface area, the value of y is shown to lie in the range 0·5 to 1 depending on the rate of stem taper. This leads to slopes on a log m vs. log n self-thinning plot in range -1 to -2 and typically around -1·5 for rates of taper based on mechanical requirements.

For the second approach, the I.T.E. EDINBURGH FOREST model, a previously published mechanistic model of plantation growth at the stand level (Thornley, 1991), is extended to natural stands by introducing average stem birth and death rates that are functions of the carbon and nitrogen substrate status of trees. Growth of even-aged and mixed-age forest over about 500 years is simulated under a variety of environmental and physiological conditions.

In general, the forest model predicts a curved log m vs. log n thinning line, but has a reasonably well-defined linear section under most conditions. The slope of the linear portion flattens as the rate at which cambium surface area scales with structural biomass increases, in qualitative agreement with the analytical prediction of the first approach. Quantitative differences between the two approaches are interpreted in terms of the process represented in the forest model. In general, the height of the thinning line increases with irradiance, but is relatively insensitive to soil nitrogen, with no change in slope in either case. However, at very low irradiance or soil nitrogen levels, the slope flattens continuously and the entire thinning line becomes markedly non-linear. Even-aged stands and mixed-age stands have different thinning slopes.Copyright 1993, 1999 Academic Press

Self-thinning, carbon balance, mechanistic model, forest growth, respiration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.