Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Constable, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 71: 357-368, 1993
© 1993 Annals of Botany Company

Multifactorial Growth Responses in Holcus lanatus: Optima and Limiting Factors

Roderick Hunt and Gillian M. Constable

The NERC Unit of Comparative Plant Ecology, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences and Department of Probability and Statistics, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

A factorial, controlled-environment experiment employing four levels each of photosynthetically-active radiation (PAR), nutrient supply and ambient temperature was conducted on the grass Holcus lanatus L. (Yorkshire fog).

The back-transformed means of log total dry weight per plant at 28 d for the highest- and lowest-yielding treatments were 533 mg and 1·8 mg respectively. An analysis of variance showed that all three environmental variables have strong and complex interaction with one another. Multivariable, polynomial response surfaces were fitted to answered questions such as: Where does maximal yield lie? How curved is the response? How steep are the gradients of yield against the three environmental variables? How sensitive are individual response curves to background levels of other factors?

The direction of change in the logarithms of total dry weight and total leaf area was positive throughout with changes in PAR, nutrient supply and temperature, except at certain extreme combinations of factor values. For leaf area ratio, the direction of change with nutrient supply and temperature was also consistently positive, but with PAR it was consistently negative, creating saddle-point in the response surface.

For all three yields variables, the response to all three factors considered individually was relatively independent of variations in the background levels of the remaining two. The ranking of percentage yields was particularly stable to such variations in background, even under markedly sub-optimal combinations of conditions.

General conclusions regarding the significance of multivariate tests were drawn, with particular reference to the conduct of inter-specific screening operations and the interpretation of multi-factor environment scenarios such as those involved in climate change research.Copyright 1993, 1999 Academic Press

Multifactorial experiment, temperature, photosynthetically-active radiation, mineral nutrients, response surfaces, optima, limiting factors, screening, climate change


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.