| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 72: 173-179, 1993
© 1993 Annals of Botany Company
Influence of Tissue Density-specific Mechanical Properties on the Scaling of Plant Height
Section of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Tissue density, 
, Young's modulus, E, breaking stress, 
, density-specific stiffness (E/), and density-specific strength (/) were determined for specimens of parenchyma, collenchyma, primary tracheids, sclerenchyma, and wood. E and were positively correlated with for parenchyma and wood. Although no correlation between E or and was seen for the other tissue-types, E and were correlated for each tissue-type (an inverse proportionality was observed for parenchyma in contrast to the other four tissue-types). Comparisons among the five tissue-types showed that E and are inversely proportional to . Parenchyma tissue samples had the lowest E and and the highest ; wood sample had the highest E and and the lowest . Comparisons among tissue-types indicated that scales roughly to the square root of E (i.e., = 0·69 1·51, r2 = 0·98; units in MN m-2). Also, / = 0·03 (E/)0·52 (r2 = 0·99). The interspecific scalling of plant height h with respect to stem diameter d (data taken from Niklas, 1993) was evaluated in terms of E / and / by assuming that certain tissue-types characterized the anatomy of the vertical stems of different plant groups (e.g., parenchyma for moss setae, primary tracheids for herbaceous dicotyledon stems, and wood for gymnosperm and dicotyledon tree trunks). The mean E / or / for each tissue-type was used to estimate h based mean d for each plant group. Regression of predicted h vs. d gave h 
d1·01. Regression of observed average h vs. observed average d showed that h d1·00. Based on the similarity of the scaling exponents, it is argued that the interspecific scaling of plant height reflects interspecific differences in the anatomy and density-specific mechanical properties of the principle tissue used to provide mechanical support to vertical stems.Copyright 1993, 1999 Academic Press
Mechanical cellometry, plant height, elastic modulus
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. I. Martinez-Cabrera, C. S. Jones, S. Espino, and H. J. Schenk Wood anatomy and wood density in shrubs: Responses to varying aridity along transcontinental transects Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1388 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Masselter and T. Speck Quantitative and qualitative changes in primary and secondary stem organization of Aristolochia macrophylla during ontogeny: functional growth analysis and experiments J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 2955 - 2967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Jaouen, T. Almeras, C. Coutand, and M. Fournier How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1583 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Niinemets, A. Portsmuth, D. Tena, M. Tobias, S. Matesanz, and F. Valladares Do we Underestimate the Importance of Leaf Size in Plant Economics? Disproportional Scaling of Support Costs Within the Spectrum of Leaf Physiognomy Ann. Bot., August 1, 2007; 100(2): 283 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Swenson and B. J. Enquist Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 451 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. WATT, J. R. MOORE, J.-P. FACON, G. M. DOWNES, P. W. CLINTON, G. COKER, M. R. DAVIS, R. SIMCOCK, R. L. PARFITT, J. DANDO, et al. Modelling Environmental Variation in Young's Modulus for Pinus radiata and Implications for Determination of Critical Buckling Height Ann. Bot., October 1, 2006; 98(4): 765 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. G. Bobich and P. S. Nobel Biomechanics and anatomy of cladode junctions for two Opuntia (Cactaceae) species and their hybrid Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2001; 88(3): 391 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|