Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buwalda, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buwalda, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Buwalda, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 73: 99-111, 1994
© 1994 Annals of Botany Company

Spatial Analysis of the Canopy of Kiwifruit Vines as it Relates to the Physical, Chemical and Postharvest Attributes of the Fruit

G. S. Smith, I. M. Gravett, C. M. Edwards, J. P. Curtis and J. G. Buwalda

The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand

The position of individual fruit on kiwifruit vines (Actinidia deliciosa var. deliciosa) grown on a horizontal trellis (pergola) and on a T-bar trellis was determined using a theodolite. The physical, chemical, and postharvest attributes of the fruit were related to their position on the vine during development.

Fruit from the pergola vines were more numerous, of lesser weight, with lower concentrations of most mineral nutrients, but greater concentrations of soluble solids, and similar flesh firmness after 12 weeks of storage at 0 °C, than fruit from the T-bar vines.

The position on the vine accounted for most of the variation in the attributes of the fruit. Differences between fruit on a single lateral accounted for 43-56% of the variation. Variation between vines was relatively small (< 4% of the total variance).

The heavier fruit were located at the apical ends of the laterals, while greater concentrations of soluble solids were associated with fruit located closer to the cordon. The larger fruit from the pergola vines developed from the early opening flowers. A similar relationship existed initially for the T-bar vines, but a reduction in growth of fruit from the early opening flowers 8 weeks after anthesis resulted in a more even distribution of fruit size at harvest.

The strongest relationship between mineral composition and postharvest attributes of the fruit was with soluble solids concentration (29-46% of the variance). The relationship with flesh firmness was weak (r = -0·14 to -0·32). Individual elements could not be considered in isolation but rather in groups of elements. Nitrogen was grouped strongly with phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, and copper, while calcium was linked with a second group which included manganese and zinc. These two groups were negatively related to one another.

The greatest proportion of fruit with superior characteristics was located in the denser parts of the canopy. Fruit with less desirable attributes were from the extremities of the canopy where the leaf area index was low.Copyright 1994, 1999 Academic Press

Actinidia deliciosa, kiwifruit, fruit position, fruit quality, within-vine variation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. N. SELEZNYOVA, T. G. THORP, A. M. BARNETT, and E. COSTES
Quantitative Analysis of Shoot Development and Branching Patterns in Actinidia
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2002; 89(4): 471 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.