Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, P. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 74: 17-25, 1994
© 1994 Annals of Botany Company

Stand Density Effects on Branching in an Annual Legume (Senna obtusifolia)

James E. Smith* and Peter W. Jordan

Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA

* For correspondence at: Center for Ecological Risk Assessment and Management, College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.

Received: 28 January 1993    Accepted: 5 January 1994   

Effects of proximity to nearest neighbours on shoot morphology and branch growth were examined for Senna obtusifolia (L.) I. & B., an annual legume species that displays wide variation in branching. Periodic surveys described location and type of growth at all nodes on plants in regularly spaced monocultures. Stands with interplant distances of 15–50 cm (51–5 plants m–2) formed closed canopies with similar amounts of leaf area and biomass. Number of lower primary branches, their degree of curvature, and location of branch apices relative to the main stem responded to interplant distance relatively early in shoot growth, before canopy closure. The final effects of ten-fold differences in planting density on the formation of these ascending lower branches were only two-fold differences in number of vertical shoot axes within the stand. An additional study examined response of lower branches to an adjacent gap in the stand. Initial number and direction of branch growth were not affected by location of the gap. The first effect of crowding by neighbours was on number of branches initiated by developing shoots. Differences in branching subsequently increased through differential survival and direction of branch growth. Such alterations principally affected lateral expansion of individual shoots, with little effect on radial symmetry or vertical distribution of leaves.

Branch morphology, canopy, competition, light quality, Senna obtusifolia, shoot growth, sicklepod


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.