Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Neal, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Neal, A. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Neal, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 75: 207-216, 1995
© 1995 Annals of Botany Company

Temporal and Nutritional Influences on the Response to Elevated CO2 in Selected British Grasses

R. Hunt, D. W. Hand, M. A. Hannah and A. M. Neal

The NERC Unit of Comparative Plant Ecology, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University, Sheffield S10 2TN and Horticulture Research International, Worthing Road, Littlehampton, West Sussex BN17 6LP, UK

To investigate the duration of the CO2 response and its interaction with mineral nutrition, CO2-enrichment experiments were performed on four British grasses of differing ecology and functional type: Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Beauv., Festuca ovina L., Festuca rubra L. and Poa annua L. Naturally-lit, glasshouse cabinets were used, with a non-limiting water supply and a daytime mean temperature of 18 °C. Two CO2 treatments were maintained at nominal concentrations of 350 and 700 vpm and were combined factorially with two levels of balanced mineral nutrition at conductivities of 0·1 and 1 mS cm-1. Harvests took place at planting-out, and at 16, 37 and 58 d thereafter.

Fitted curves were used to derive instantaneous values of total dry weight, relative growth rate (RGR), shoot weight fraction (SWF) and unit shoot rate (USR) for all combinations of species, CO2 level, nutrient level and time of harvesting.

At the higher nutrient level there was a reasonably close agreement with previous estimates of the CO2 response in the four species. The response, if any, most often arose from an increase in USR being accompanied by a less than proportionate decline in SWF. Responses were sustained throughout the period studied. At the lower nutrient level, all species showed a CO2 response initially, but this declined at a rate which was inversely related to the CO2-responsiveness of the species at the higher nutrient level.

The underlying ontogenetic drift appeared to be markedly towards adjustment in SWF and away from that of USR. However, this drift was retarded, suspended or even reversed by low-nutrient conditions and/or by high CO2 responsiveness in the species itself.Copyright 1995, 1999 Academic Press

Climate change, CO2 enrichment, plant strategies, mineral nutrition, growth analysis, relative growth rate, shoot weight fraction, unit shoot rate, functional equilibria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. Jenkins Klus, S. Kalisz, P. S. Curtis, J. A. Teeri, and S. J. Tonsor
Family- and population-level responses to atmospheric CO2 concentration: gas exchange and the allocation of C, N, and biomass in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae)
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2001; 88(6): 1080 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. A. Morgan, R.H. Skinner, and J. D. Hanson
Nitrogen and CO2 Affect Regrowth and Biomass Partitioning Differently in Forages of Three Functional Groups
Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 78 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.