Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oyanagi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Suge, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oyanagi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Suge, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oyanagi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Suge, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 75: 229-235, 1995
© 1995 Annals of Botany Company

Interactions between Hydrotropism and Gravitropism in the Primary Seminal Roots of Triticum eastivum L.

A. Oyanagi, H. Takahashi and H. Suge

Institute of Genetic Ecology, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-77, and National Agriculture Research Center, Tsukuba 305, Japan

It has been proposed that hydrotropism interacts with gravitropism in seedling roots; that is, roots which are highly gravitropic show less hydrotropism (Takahashi and Suge, 1991 Physiologia Plantarum 82: 24-31; Takahashi and Scott, 1993 Plant, Cell and Environment 16: 99-103). Here, we examine varietal differences in the hydrotropic response and its interaction with gravitropism in wheat roots. Primary seminal roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were hydrotropically stimulated by different moisture gradients established by placing wet cheesecloth and saturated solutions of different salts in closed chambers. From equations obtained by relative humidity (RH) at different distances from the wet cheesecloth, moisture gradients at the root-tip level were estimated to be 0·03 to 1·84% RH mm-1, depending upon the salt introduced into the chamber. The roots showed positive hydrotropism in response to 0·67% RH mm-1, and the response apparently increased as the gradient was strengthened. When the primary seminal roots of 12 cultivars were exposed to a moisture gradient of 1·84% RH mm-1, hydrotropic response significantly differed depending upon the cultivar tested. Among the cultivars, the roots of Norin 11, Norin 15, Norin 117, and Norin 125 responded hydrotropically more strongly than the others. These roots, with the exception of Norin 11, showed a less vigorous response to gravity compared to the remaining cultivars. However, the roots of Norin 20, Norin 38, and Norin 107 were relatively unresponsive to both a moisture gradient and to gravity. Thus, the primary seminal roots of wheat respond hydrotropically, and the responsiveness differs among cultivars. However, the varietal difference in hydrotropic response cannot be explained solely by converse differences in responsiveness to gravity.Copyright 1995, 1999 Academic Press

Cultivar, gravitropism, hydrotropism, primary seminal roots, Triticum aestivum L., wheat


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Kobayashi, A. Takahashi, Y. Kakimoto, Y. Miyazawa, N. Fujii, A. Higashitani, and H. Takahashi
From the Cover: A gene essential for hydrotropism in roots
PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4724 - 4729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. TSUDA, N. MIYAMOTO, H. TAKAHASHI, K. ISHIHARA, and T. HIRASAWA
Roots of Pisum sativum L. Exhibit Hydrotropism in Response to a Water Potential Gradient in Vermiculite
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2003; 92(6): 767 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
N. Miyamoto, T. Ookawa, H. Takahashi, and T. Hirasawa
Water Uptake and Hydraulic Properties of Elongating Cells in Hydrotropically Bending Roots of Pisum sativum L.
Plant Cell Physiol., April 15, 2002; 43(4): 393 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.