Annals of Botany 77: 197-202, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company
Mechanical Differences Between Free-standing and Supported Wheat Plants, Triticum aestivum L.
School of Biological Sciences, Stopford Building, University of Manchester,, Oxford Road,, Manchester, M13 9PT, U.K.
July 5, 1995 ; August 28, 1995
The effect of wind sway on the mechanical characteristics of the anchorage roots and the stem was investigated in mature winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL., cv. Hereward). Wheat plants were field-grown, either supported by a frame, which prevented wind sway, or unsupported (free-standing) and the morphology and mechanical properties of the stems and the anchorage, coronal , roots were measured.
Wind sway had little influence on either the stem height or ear weight of the plants but did affect the mechanical properties of the stem. Stems of supported plants were weaker and more flexible than the stems of free-standing plants. There were also differences in the anchorage systems between the treatments: supported plants had just under half as many coronal anchorage roots as the free-standing plants. This reduced the anchorage strength of supported plants by a third.
These differences in mechanical structure meant that the free-standing plants were more resistant to stem buckling and more resistant to anchorage failure. However, considering the difference in the need for mechanical strength in plants from the two regimes, these differences were small. This suggests that wheat has inherent mechanical integrity and, as a monocotyledon with no secondary thickening, it differs little structurally between environments.
Triticum aestivumL.; thigmomorphogenesis; anchorage; safety factor; mechanical stimulation
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Martin, N. Leblanc-Fournier, W. Azri, C. Lenne, C. Henry, C. Coutand, and J.-L. Julien Characterization and expression analysis under bending and other abiotic factors of PtaZFP2, a poplar gene encoding a Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein Tree Physiol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 125 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Puijalon, J.-P. Lena, and G. Bornette Interactive Effects of Nutrient and Mechanical Stresses on Plant Morphology Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1297 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oladokun and A. Ennos Structural development and stability of rice Oryza sativa L. var. Nerica 1 J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3123 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Puijalon, G. Bornette, and P. Sagnes Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2005; 56(412): 777 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Smith and A. R. Ennos The effects of air flow and stem flexure on the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the stems of sunflowers Helianthus annuus L. J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2003; 54(383): 845 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Uchida and K. T. Yamamoto Effects of Mechanical Vibration on Seed Germination of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2002; 43(6): 647 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




