Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POWELL, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHAPMAN, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by POWELL, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHAPMAN, A. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by POWELL, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by CHAPMAN, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 77: 305-316, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

A Re-assessment of Relationships within Epacridaceae

J. M. POWELL+, D. M. CRAYN§, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, D. A. MORRISON and A. R. CHAPMAN

National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, 2000, Australia School of Biological Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia Department of Applied Biology, University of Technology, Sydney, 2007, Australia Western Australian Herbarium, Como, WA 6152, Australia

February 2, 1995 ; June 1, 1995

An extensive database of predominantly morphological characters has been assembled for the family Epacridaceae. Problems of homology across the family and its outgroups were encountered for several characters. A phylogenetic analysis, using only those characters for which we were fairly confident of our assessment of homology, was undertaken to establish broad relationships within the family as a basis for a re-assessment of the supra-generic classification. The resultant phylogeny is weakly resolved and lacks robustness in the basal clades. Previous classifications of the family are assessed in the light of this analysis, and an alternative arrangement of four tribes is proposed.

Cladistic; Epacridaceae; phylogeny; relationships; morphology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. LENS, P. GASSON, E. SMETS, and S. JANSEN
Comparative Wood Anatomy of Epacrids (Styphelioideae, Ericaceae s.l.)
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2003; 91(7): 835 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. A. Kron, W. S. Judd, and D. M. Crayn
Phylogenetic analyses of Andromedeae (Ericaceae subfam. Vaccinioideae)
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 1999; 86(9): 1290 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.