Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MC LEAN, C.
Right arrow Articles by LAWRIE, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MC LEAN, C.
Right arrow Articles by LAWRIE, A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by MC LEAN, C.
Right arrow Articles by LAWRIE, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 77: 405-412, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

Patterns of Root Colonization in Epacridaceous Plants Collected from Different Sites

C. MC LEAN and A. C. LAWRIE

Victorian College of Agriculture and Horticulture, Burnley Gardens, Swan Street, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, Australia Department of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia

February 3, 1995 ; July 31, 1995

Root colonization was studied in ten species of the Epacridaceae at three sites in Victoria by morphological and cross-inoculation experiments. The sites and genera chosen were Cranbourne [Epacris impressa Labill. andLeucopogon ericoides(Smith) R. Br.] and Rye [L. parviflorus(Andrews) Lindley] on the Mornington Peninsula, and the Grampians[Astroloma conostephioides(Sond.) Benth.,A. humifusum(Cav.) R. Br.,A pinifolium(R. Br.) Benth,Brachyloma daphnoides(Smith) Benth.,E. impressa, E. impressavar.grandifloraBenth. andStyphelia adscendensR. Br.] in western Victoria. For morphological studies, samples of roots from each species at each site were cleared and stained and examined microscopically. For cross-inoculation studies, cuttings from each site were struck in potting medium inoculated with soil from the same and other sites. The ericoid mycorrhizae in the roots of plants found at or grown in Cranbourne and Rye soils were similar. Both were significantly different from the internal hyphae found in the roots of plants found at or grown in Grampians soils, which were three times larger in diameter and formed dense coils which filled the host cell and invaded adjacent epidermal cells. This suggests that more than one fungus is involved in the relationships, that the Mornington Peninsula sites had a different fungus from the Grampians site and that host specificity is low. Vesicular structures were also found commonly on plants at the Grampians site, in contrast with other sites.

Epacridaceae; root; fungus; mycorrhiza; morphology; inoculation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.