Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHISHIDO, M.
Right arrow Articles by CHANWAY, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SHISHIDO, M.
Right arrow Articles by CHANWAY, C. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by SHISHIDO, M.
Right arrow Articles by CHANWAY, C. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 77: 433-442, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Bacillus Strains on Pine and Spruce Seedling Growth and Mycorrhizal Infection

M. SHISHIDO, H. B. MASSICOTTE and C. P. CHANWAY

Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada Department of Soil Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada

July 10, 1995 ; November 1, 1995

Rifamycin-resistant derivatives of plant growth promotingBacillus polymyxa strains L6, Pw-2, and S20 were used to evaluate the interaction of bacterial–mycorrhizal co-inoculation on pine and spruce seedling growth. We were particularly interested in determining if the mechanism by which bacteria stimulated seedling growth depended on the presence of ectomycorrhizae. Mycorrhizal inoculum was introduced by adding 2ml of one of six forest floor soil types originating from different spruce and pine stands to seedling containers. Mycorrhizal roots developed in 34% of pine and 27% of spruce seedlings treated with forest soil, but no differences between forest soils were detected. Most mycorrhizae were formed byWilcoxinasp. (E-strain) (98% for spruce and 67% for pine); small numbers ofAmphinema-like,Mycelium radicis atrovirens, Suillus-like,Thelephora-like, andTuber-like mycorrhizae were also found on pine (27% in total).Thelephora-like fungi comprised 2% of spruce mycorrhize. In the absence of bacterial inoculum, spruce seedling biomass was positively correlated with the number of mycorrhizal root tips, but this trend was not detected in spruce inoculated with bacteria or in pine. Bacterial inoculation did not influence the mycorrhizal status of seedlings, but all threeBacillusstrains stimulated growth of both conifer species. Root biomass, in particular, was significantly enhanced by up to 18% compared with uninoculated controls. Mycorrhizal fungi improved the growth of spruce seedlings, but plant growth promotion byBacilluswas similar for mycorrizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings of both species. Our results suggest thatBacillusstrains L6-16R, Pw-2R, and S20-R enhance conifer seedling growth through a mechanism unrelated to mycorrhizal fungi.

Hybrid spruce; Picea glaucaxengelmannii ; lodgepole pine; Pinus contortavar.latifoliaEngelm.; inoculation; Bacillus polymyxa; seedling growth promotion; mycorrhizae


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. Timmusk, N. Grantcharova, and E. G. H. Wagner
Paenibacillus polymyxa Invades Plant Roots and Forms Biofilms
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2005; 71(11): 7292 - 7300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.