Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BUNCE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by ZISKA, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BUNCE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by ZISKA, L. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BUNCE, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by ZISKA, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 77: 507-514, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company

Responses of Respiration to Increases in Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Temperature in Three Soybean Cultivars

JAMES A. BUNCE and LEWIS H. ZISKA

Climate Stress Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350, U.S.A.

May 18, 1995 ; November 28, 1995

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how respiration of soybeans may respond to potential increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and growth temperature. Three cultivars of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.), from maturity groups 00, IV, and VIII, were grown at 370, 555 and 740cm3m-3carbon dioxide concentrations at 20/15, 25/20, and 31/26°C day/night temperatures. Rates of carbon dioxide efflux in the dark were measured for whole plants several times during exponential growth. These measurements were made at the night temperature and the carbon dioxide concentration at which the plants were grown. For the lowest and highest temperature treatments, the short term response of respiration rate to measurement at the three growth carbon dioxide concentrations was also determined. Elemental analysis of the tissue was used to estimate the growth conversion efficiency. This was combined with the observed relative growth rates to estimate growth respiration. Maintenance respiration was estimated as the difference between growth respiration and total respiration. Respiration rates were generally sensitive to short term changes in the measurement carbon dioxide concentration for plants grown at the lowest, but not the highest carbon dioxide concentration. At all temperatures, growth at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations decreased total respiration measured at the growth concentration, with no significant differences among cultivars. Total respiration increased very little with increasing growth temperature, despite an increase in relative growth rate. Growth respiration was not affected by carbon dioxide treatment at any temperature, but increased with temperature because of the increase in relative growth rate. Values calculated for maintenance respiration decreased with increasing carbon dioxide concentration and also decreased with increasing temperature. Calculated values of maintenance respiration were sometimes zero or negative at the warmer temperatures. This suggests that respiration rates measured in the dark may not have reflected average 24-h rates of energy use. The results indicate that increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration may reduce respiration in soybeans, and respiration may be insensitive to climate warming.

Glycine max L. (Merr.); carbon dioxide; respiration; temperature; climate change


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. A. BUNCE
Response of Respiration of Soybean Leaves Grown at Ambient and Elevated Carbon Dioxide Concentrations to Day-to-day Variation in Light and Temperature under Field Conditions
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2005; 95(6): 1059 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.