| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 78: 269-281, 1996
© 1996 Annals of Botany Company
REVIEW |
Transductions to Generate Plant Form and Pattern: An Essay on Cause and Effect
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
February 6, 1996 ; May 17, 1996
Many complex processes can be broken into transduction steps where one state is converted to another by a well defined activity. One difficulty for analysis is that transductions occur in chains or networks. Another, of primary concern here, is that a single transduction can be complex. Some such transductions can efficiently explain phenomena often thought to be summations or orchestrations of many simple transductions. Pattern formation is in this category. For a wide range of transductions one can define cause and effect in a differential equation. In its integral one can define the before and after states. Co-variation is the main experimental tactic to characterize unknown transductions. The before state (input) is altered, change in the after state (output) is assayed. Thus an unknown transduction, with cause and effect embodied in the differential, is investigated through long-term changes in its integral. This is fully practical when all of the integral is known or readily surmised, as in simple discrete biochemical transductions. As causal differential expressions become complex, their integrals become more versatile in generating output because this changes not only with variation in the expression itself but also with boundary conditions and limits. These very features, however, make such a function increasingly intractable to discovery by co-variation. Only a small part of the integral is embodied in the before and after states; the remainder is not readily surmised. Accordingly, in contrast to reliance on intervention to deduce unknown simple transductions, the complex ones are generally established through formalization of the differential nature of the process itself.
Transduction; gene expression; pattern formation; phyllotaxis; morphogenesis; differentiation; integration; biophysics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Coen, A.-G. Rolland-Lagan, M. Matthews, J. A. Bangham, and P. Prusinkiewicz Inaugural Article: The genetics of geometry PNAS, April 6, 2004; 101(14): 4728 - 4735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Nath, B. C. W. Crawford, R. Carpenter, and E. Coen Genetic Control of Surface Curvature Science, February 28, 2003; 299(5611): 1404 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Coutand and B. Moulia Biomechanical study of the effect of a controlled bending on tomato stem elongation: local strain sensing and spatial integration of the signal J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2000; 51(352): 1825 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. B Green Expression of pattern in plants: combining molecular and calculus-based biophysical paradigms Am. J. Botany, August 1, 1999; 86(8): 1059 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|