Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UMEKI, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by UMEKI, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by UMEKI, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 79: 631-641, 1997
© 1997 Annals of Botany Company

Effect of Crown Asymmetry on Size–Structure Dynamics of Plant Populations

KIYOSHI UMEKI

Hokkaido Forestry Research Institute, Koshunai, Bibai, Hokkaido, 079-01, Japan

Received April 10, 1996 ; Accepted December 19, 1996

The effect of crown asymmetry on the size–structure dynamics of populations was evaluated using a spatial competition model incorporating crown asymmetry. Computer simulations were carried out with various combinations of density levels, spatial patterns, and degrees of asymmetry in competition to assess how they modify the effect of crown asymmetry on size–structure dynamics.

In the model, crown asymmetry is expressed by the crown-vector, or the vector linking the stem base and the centre of the projected area of the crown on the horizontal plane. Crown-vectors are assumed to develop in the manner by which crowns repel each other. As crown-vectors develop, the positions of the crown-centres move. Competition between individuals is expressed by a neighbourhood model, in which individual growth is determined by the distance from, and size of, the neighbours' crown-centres.

Generally, populations of individuals which developed asymmetric crowns had larger survivorship, larger mean size, smaller coefficients of variation and skewness, and a more regular spatial pattern than populations of individuals which developed symmetric crowns. The effect of crown symmetry is generally stronger in populations with high density and a clumped spatial pattern. The effect of mortality caused by one-sided competition on size-structure dynamics was similar to that of crown asymmetry; mortality increased mean size, reduced size hierarchy, and made the spatial pattern more regular. Because mortality was heavier in populations without crown asymmetry, its effect on size-structure dynamics cancelled out, or overwhelmed, the effect of crown asymmetry in later growth stages. If crown asymmetry is associated with a reduction in growth, the effect of crown asymmetry is reduced. Nevertheless, the resultant population structure is different from that of populations without crown asymmetry.

Competition; crown asymmetry; morphological plasticity; neighbourhood interference model; size-structure dynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.