Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WERKER, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by JAGGARD, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WERKER, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by JAGGARD, K. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by WERKER, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by JAGGARD, K. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 79: 657-665, 1997
© 1997 Annals of Botany Company

Modelling Asymmetrical Growth Curves that Rise and then Fall: Applications to Foliage Dynamics of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

A. R. WERKER and K. W. JAGGARD

IACR Broom's Barn, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP, U.K.

Received October 11, 1996 ; Accepted January 2, 1997

This paper discusses the derivation and fitting of three empirical models with turning points for describing the growth of plant components, such as shoot weight, leaf area and root length, that typically rise and then fall during the course of the growing season. The models (Models I, II and III) have analytical solutions and may be viewed as extensions of the Gompertz, Richards and Chanter growth equations. They differ by having an additional parameter which, following a sigmoidal rise of the dependent variable, determines subsequent net rate of decline. The models were fitted to sequential measures of foliage cover of sugar beet crops grown in the UK during 1980–1991. It was important that this could be done with relative ease using standard statistical procedures. Partial linear transformations of two of the models, with one non-linear parameter remaining, are described; these were useful for estimating initial values for the parameters. All three models described the data well, although the fitting of Model II invariably failed to converge. For Models I and III common and separate parameters, amongst years, were estimated relating to date of emergence, initial relative growth rate, maximum cover attained and rate of late season decline of foliage cover. The reduction in the residual mean square on fitting separate, rather than common, parameters was usually significant. The models accommodate several biological processes that yield similar shapes. This is demonstrated for Model I, in relation to its formulation and to effects of small perturbations in the values of the parameters on the shape of the curves. Model I, the simplest of the three models tested, has good fitting properties, and in practice was best suited to describing foliage cover dynamics of sugar beet.

Beta vulgaris L.; sugar beet; foliage cover; senescence; models; parameter estimation; growth functions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.