Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARCELIS, L. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAAN HOFMAN-EIJER, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MARCELIS, L. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAAN HOFMAN-EIJER, L. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by MARCELIS, L. F. M.
Right arrow Articles by BAAN HOFMAN-EIJER, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 79: 687-693, 1997
© 1997 Annals of Botany Company

Effects of Seed Number on Competition and Dominance among Fruits in Capsicum annuum L.

L. F. M. MARCELIS and L. R. BAAN HOFMAN-EIJER

Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), P.O. Box 14, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Received September 30, 1996 ; Accepted January 24, 1997

The effects of seed number on set, development and growth of a fruit, and on inhibition of later-developed fruits were studied by varying the pollen load on the stigma of sweet pepper flowers (Capsicum annuum L.). Despite much variation, a linear increase in individual fruit weight with seed number could be observed. Seed number affected the growth rate rather than the growing period of fruit. When seed numbers were low, the probability of fruit setting was positively related to seed number. However, a relatively low seed number (50–100 seeds/fruit: 20–30% of the maximum seed number) was sufficient for maximal fruit set.

An increase in seed number increased the inhibitory effect of a fruit on set and growth of later-developing fruits. As a result, when pollination treatments were applied to all the flowers of a plant, results could be quite different to those obtained when only a limited number of flowers were treated. Fruit set of the second fruit was reduced by the application of a high pollen load to the first flower, even when the first fruit aborted before it had accumulated much dry matter. Our results suggest that growth inhibition of the second fruit by seed number of the first fruit is controlled both by competition for limited assimilates, as well as by dominance due to the production of plant growth regulators by the developing fruit.

Sweet pepper; Capsicum annuum L.; pollination; fruit set; abortion; abscission; fruit growth; first-fruit dominance; sink strength


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. M. Wubs, Y. Ma, E. Heuvelink, and L. F. M. Marcelis
Genetic differences in fruit-set patterns are determined by differences in fruit sink strength and a source : sink threshold for fruit set
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2009; 104(5): 957 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
L. F. M. Marcelis, E. Heuvelink, L. R. Baan Hofman-Eijer, J. Den Bakker, and L. B. Xue
Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2004; 55(406): 2261 - 2268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.