Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GUILIONI, L.
Right arrow Articles by TARDIEU, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GUILIONI, L.
Right arrow Articles by TARDIEU, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GUILIONI, L.
Right arrow Articles by TARDIEU, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 80: 159-168, 1997
© 1997 Annals of Botany Company

Heat Stress-induced Abortion of Buds and Flowers in Pea: Is Sensitivity Linked to Organ Age or to Relations between Reproductive Organs?

LYDIE GUILIONI+,, JACQUES WERY and FRANCOIS TARDIEU

INRA-ENSA.M, Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux (LEPSE), 2, place Viala, 34060, Montpellier, cedex 1, France

Received August 5, 1996 ; Accepted March 19, 1997 .

A short period of heat stress can cause a significant increase in abortion frequency of floral buds and flowers in pea, but a large variability in sensitivity exists among reproductive organs (ROs) within a plant or between plants. We have analysed spatial distribution of abortion frequency in plants subjected or not subjected to heat stress in: (1) four controlled environment experiments in which apex temperature was increased to 31 °C for 6 h per day for 4 d (moderate stress); (2) one field experiment with a similar level of stress; and (3) one experiment with 2 d with 33/30 °C day/night (severe stress) in addition to treatment (1). Influence of neighbouring organs on sensitivity to heat stress was analysed by partial flower removal. Severe heat stress caused rapid interruption of RO development followed by abscission while, in moderate stress, at leat 4 d elapsed between cessation of stress and first symptoms of abortion. In both moderate stress and control treatments, abortion frequency followed a consistent pattern along the stem with no abortion on the lowest reproductive phytomeres, a temperature-dependent abortion frequency on intermediate phytomeres and 100% abortion on apical phytomeres. Regardless of temperature, this pattern was shifted by four positions if ROs were removed on the lowest four reproductive phytomeres, and no abortion was observed if young pods were sequentially removed. Moderate heat stress increased the effect of developing ROs on abortion frequency of younger ROs located above them. We suggest that the effect of mild stress should be viewed as the acceleration of a programme linked to the normal termination of phytomere production during the plant cycle, rather than as an abrupt event linked to stress.

Pisum sativum; heat stress; abortion; abscission; age; organ-to-organ relations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. J. Morrison and D. W. Stewart
Heat Stress during Flowering in Summer Brassica
Crop Sci., May 1, 2002; 42(3): 797 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Sato, M. M. Peet, and J. F. Thomas
Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2002; 53(371): 1187 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. V. Vara Prasad, P. Q. Craufurd, R. J. Summerfield, and T. R. Wheeler
Effects of short episodes of heat stress on flower production and fruit-set of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2000; 51(345): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.