Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 81: 165-171, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Modelling Shoot[ratio]Root Relations: the Only Way Forward?

JOHN H. M. THORNLEY

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (Edinburgh), Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, UK

August 7, 1997 ; September 1, 1997 . September 14, 1997 .

The basic transport-resistance (TR) model of shoot[ratio]root carbon[ratio]nitrogen allocation is described. This approach assumes that the two processes of substrate transport and chemical conversion determine allocation. It is suggested thatallallocation models, whether built for the purposes of theoretical investigation or practical application, should start with this irreducible framework. Here it is assumed that the processes operate according to: (a) for substrate sources, dependence on shoot and root sizes with possible product inhibition; (b) for transport, movement down a substrate concentration gradient; and (c) for substrate sinks or utilization, linear bisubstrate kinetics. Some dynamic properties of the model are explored. Failure of this approach to allocation flags the need for additional mechanisms to control the processes. Details of the failure will indicate the modifications needed, which may involve hormones or reflect teleonomy (apparently goal-seeking behaviour), and which are added to the irreducible framework. However, these additions should not replace the irreducible framework of transport and chemical conversions, because they do not in reality. Modifications to the basic model to represent possibilities such as ontogenesis with the transition from exponential growth towards a steady state or with the scaling of within-plant transport resistances with plant size, the influence of hormones, and active transport, are described.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Partitioning; allocation; model; shoot[ratio]root relations; plant growth.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
E. COSTES, E. GARCIA-VILLANUEVA, C. JOURDAN, J. L. REGNARD, and Y. GUEDON
Co-ordinated Growth between Aerial and Root Systems in Young Apple Plants Issued from in vitro Culture
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 85 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Vadose Zone JHome page
Q. Zuo, F. Jie, R. Zhang, and L. Meng
A Generalized Function of Wheat's Root Length Density Distributions
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2004; 3(1): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. I. AGREN and O. FRANKLIN
Root : Shoot Ratios, Optimization and Nitrogen Productivity
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2003; 92(6): 795 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.