Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EL HAFID, R.
Right arrow Articles by SAMIR, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by EL HAFID, R.
Right arrow Articles by SAMIR, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by EL HAFID, R.
Right arrow Articles by SAMIR, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 81: 363-370, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Physiological Responses of Spring Durum Wheat Cultivars to Early-season Drought in a Mediterranean Environment

R. EL HAFID, DAN H. SMITH+,, M. KARROU and K. SAMIR

National Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 589, Settat, Morocco Department of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523 Faculté des Sciences Mohammedia Ben M'sik, Université Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco

June 11, 1997 ; August 11, 1997 . November 2, 1997 .

The Mediterranean climate of North Africa is characterized by uncertain rainfall immediately after seedling emergence, leading to drought early in the growing season which depresses durum wheat production. However, there is limited understanding of the physiological basis of resistance of spring durum wheat to drought in rainfed Mediterranean regions. The objectives of this study were to examine differences in some physiological characters among spring durum wheat cultivars in response to duration of early-season drought, and to determine the relationship of these characters to drought resistance. In two field experiments (1995 and 1996 growing seasons) and a glasshouse experiment (1996), six spring sown durum wheat cultivars were evaluated under four water regimes: well irrigated and three different water deficits from emergence until the onset of tillering, mid-tillering or at the end of tillering. Cultivars differed in their response. Decreases in photosynthesis soon after drought stress was imposed resulted mainly from reduced stomatal conductance. Continued water deficits also reduced mesophyll photosynthetic activity. Possible factors determining the drought-resistance of a cultivar are lower sensitivity of CO2exchange rate, net CO2uptake to water loss ratio, stomatal resistance, relative water content and greater osmotic adjustment under stress. Furthermore, there is sufficient intraspecific variation in these physiological attributes to suggest their use as selection tools.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Wheat;Triticum durumDesf.; early-season drought; physiological responses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.