Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KING, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KING, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by KING, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 82: 1-7, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Relationship Between Crown Architecture and Branch Orientation in Rain Forest Trees

DAVID A. KING+,

Ecosystem Dynamics, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia

September 22, 1997 ; December 17, 1997 . March 12, 1998 .

Measurements of the dimensions and angles of branches on saplings of 58 species in rain forests of NE Australia and Central America showed that architectural groups defined in terms of developmental rules differ in branch shape and angle. Species were classified into four groups based on visual assessments of leaf arrangement and trunk form. The three plagiotropic groups (with planar leaf arrangements) had more nearly horizontal branches than the orthotropic group (with more three dimensional leaf arrangements). The plagiotropic groups each had a significantly lower ratio of branch depth to width than the orthotropic group, with branch width defined as the horizontal breadth of the branch foliage and depth defined as the thickness of the foliage perpendicular to the branch axis and the width measurement. The three plagiotropic groups differed in the angle of the branch tip relative to the overall branch. However, individual saplings of the different groups showed some overlap in branch characteristics. Branch angle and depth to width ratio were correlated and were related to light level, the latter assessed for three Tasmanian rain forest species. Both plagiotropic and orthotropic species had more erect and three dimensional branches in open environments than in shade. Thus, the architectural groups differ in branch geometry in common environments, but also exhibit plasticity in response to light.

Tree architecture, branch, phyllotaxis, plagiotropic, orthotropic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. Charles-Dominique, C. Edelin, and A. Bouchard
Architectural strategies of Cornus sericea, a native but invasive shrub of Southern Quebec, Canada, under an open or a closed canopy
Ann. Bot., November 8, 2009; (2009) mcp273v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tree PhysiolHome page
T. M. Bleby, I. J. Colquhoun, and M. A. Adams
Architectural plasticity in young Eucalyptus marginata on restored bauxite mines and adjacent natural forest in south-western Australia
Tree Physiol, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 1033 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
B. F. Wilson
Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2000; 87(5): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.