Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEI, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by LECHOWICZ, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LEI, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by LECHOWICZ, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LEI, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by LECHOWICZ, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 82: 9-19, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Diverse Responses of Maple Saplings to Forest Light Regimes

THOMAS T. LEI+, and MARTIN J. LECHOWICZ

Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1B1

July 2, 1997 ; January 28, 1998 . March 13, 1998 .

Seedlings of 11 species of forest maples (AcerL.) were grown outdoors from budburst to senescence under three light regimes: ‘gap centre under clear skies’ (approx. 20% open sky irradiance; red:far-red ratio=1.12); ‘gap centre under cloudy skies’ (1.5%, ratio=1.03); and ‘gap edge’ (2.5%, ratio=0.6). Seedlings grown under the gap centre (clear sky) regime had significantly greater height growth, greater specific leaf mass, higher root:shoot ratio, greater investment in roots, higher leaf nitrogen concentrations, greater chlorophylla:bratio, lower photosynthetic rates under dim light, higher maximum photosynthetic rate, higher stomatal conductance, and lower leaf internal CO2concentrations compared with those grown in either gap edge or gap centre (cloudy) regimes. Responses to the gap edgevs.gap centre (cloudy) treatments differ little, suggesting that shade acclimation in forest maple seedlings is mainly a response to light intensity rather than spectral quality. The ubiquitous and, except for leaf internal CO2concentration, highly significant interspecific variation in traits was broad-ranging and continuous. These results suggest that (1) the responses to light quality found in shade intolerant herbaceous and woody species growing in more open habitats may not have a selective advantage in seedlings of shade tolerant forest trees, and (2) the adaptive plastic response to understoreyvs.gap environments in forest maples, which is qualitatively consistent across species, is founded on co-ordinated, small shifts in sets of functionally inter-related traits.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Acer,forest gap heterogeneity, plasticity, specific leaf mass, photosynthesis, leaf chlorophyll, nitrogen, stomatal density, root growth, root:shoot ratio, growth form.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ForestryHome page
K. Kenderes, B. Mihok, and T. Standovar
Thirty years of gap dynamics in a central european beech forest reserve
Forestry, March 19, 2008; (2008) cpn001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Verdu and J. Climent
Evolutionary correlations of polycyclic shoot growth in Acer (Sapindaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1316 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. P. SANTOS and M. S. BUCKERIDGE
The Role of the Storage Carbon of Cotyledons in the Establishment of Seedlings of Hymenaea courbaril Under Different Light Conditions
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 819 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
T. J. Givnish, R. A. Montgomery, and G. Goldstein
Adaptive radiation of photosynthetic physiology in the Hawaiian lobeliads: light regimes, static light responses, and whole-plant compensation points
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 228 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.