Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by NIKLAS, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 82: 147-156, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Effects of Vibration on Mechanical Properties and Biomass Allocation Pattern ofCapsella bursa-pastoris(Cruciferae)

KARL J. NIKLAS

Section of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

September 16, 1997 ; March 13, 1998 . April 14, 1998 .

The herbaceous dicot speciesCapsella bursa-pastoris(Cruciferae) was used to determine the influence of chronic mechanical perturbation on the biomass allocation pattern (i.e. dry weight distribution among roots, stems and reproductive structures) and the mechanical properties of roots and stems (i.e. tensile breaking stress and Young's modulus). It was hypothesized that mechanically stimulated plants would allocate more of their total biomass to root systems and less to shoots compared to control plants and that the breaking stress (a measure of strength) and Young's modulus (a measure of material stiffness) would increase for roots and decrease for stems because these responses would adaptively reduce the bending moment at the base of shoots and increase the anchorage strength of root systems. It was also hypothesized that mechanical perturbation would maladaptively reduce the relative fitness of individuals by reducing biomass allocation to their reproductive organs and the ability to broadcast seeds by means of elastic stem flexure. These hypotheses were tested by vibrating cultivated plants for 60 s every day during the course of growth to maturity and comparing their dry weight distributions and the mechanical properties of their body parts (measured in tension) to those of undisturbed control plants. Based on a total of 51 experimentally manipulated and 44 control plants for which mechanical properties were successfully tested, chronic organ flexure resulted in more massive root systems and less massive vegetative shoots, increased the magnitudes of root breaking stress and Young's modulus and had the reverse effect on stems, reduced the dry weight of reproductive structures at maturity, delayed the formation of the first mature flower and fruit, and accelerated the on-set of plant senescence compared to control plants. These responses to chronic organ flexure are interpreted to be vegetatively adaptive, since they reduce the probability of stem and root failure as a consequence of wind-pressure or foraging, and to be reproductively maladaptive, since they reduce reproductive effort and the ability to mechanically discharge seeds.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Adaptation, biomass allocation, biomechanics, elastic properties, roots, stems, thigmomorphogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Allen, P. A. Bisbee, R. L. Darnell, A. Kuang, L. H. Levine, M. E. Musgrave, and J. J. W. A. van Loon
Gravity control of growth form in Brassica rapa and Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae): Consequences for secondary metabolism
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2009; 96(3): 652 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
L. Martin, N. Leblanc-Fournier, W. Azri, C. Lenne, C. Henry, C. Coutand, and J.-L. Julien
Characterization and expression analysis under bending and other abiotic factors of PtaZFP2, a poplar gene encoding a Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein
Tree Physiol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 125 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. Coutand, C. Dupraz, G. Jaouen, S. Ploquin, and B. Adam
Mechanical Stimuli Regulate the Allocation of Biomass in Trees: Demonstration with Young Prunus avium Trees
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2008; 101(9): 1421 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Puijalon, J.-P. Lena, and G. Bornette
Interactive Effects of Nutrient and Mechanical Stresses on Plant Morphology
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2007; 100(6): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. D. H. Sprayberry and T. L. Daniel
Flower tracking in hawkmoths: behavior and energetics
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2007; 210(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Y. Liu, F. Schieving, J. F. Stuefer, and N. P. R. Anten
The Effects of Mechanical Stress and Spectral Shading on the Growth and Allocation of Ten Genotypes of a Stoloniferous Plant
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 121 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Read and A. Stokes
Plant biomechanics in an ecological context
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1546 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. Puijalon and G. Bornette
Phenotypic plasticity and mechanical stress: biomass partitioning and clonal growth of an aquatic plant species
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1090 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. F. Cahill Jr., J. P. Castelli, and B. B. Casper
Separate effects of human visitation and touch on plant growth and herbivory in an old-field community
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2002; 89(9): 1401 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
A. Uchida and K. T. Yamamoto
Effects of Mechanical Vibration on Seed Germination of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2002; 43(6): 647 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.