| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 82: 773-778, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company
Variation in the Durations of the Photoperiod-sensitive and Photoperiod-insensitive Phases of Post-first Flowering Development in Maturity Isolines of Soyabean [Glycine max(L.) Merrill] Clark
Plant Environment Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Cutbush Lane, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AD, UK
February 12, 1998 ; May 12, 1998 . July 30, 1998 .
Plants of eight isolines of soyabean [Glycine max(L.) Merrill], comprising all combinations of two alleles at the three lociE1/e1,E2/e2andE3/e3in the cultivar Clark background, were transferred after different periods following first flowering from long days (LD, 14 h d-1) to short days (SD, 12 h d-1) andvice versain a reciprocal-transfer experiment in a plastic house maintained at 30/24 °C (day/night). Photoperiod (0.10>P>0.05), transfer time (P<0.001),>isoline (P<0.001), and their interactions (P<0.001) all affected flowering duration, i.e. the period from first flowering until the appearance of the last flower. The flowering duration comprised two distinct phases: a photoperiod-sensitive phase beginning at first flowering, and a subsequent photoperiod-insensitive phase. The duration of the photoperiod-sensitive phase varied much more among the isolines in LD than in SD. Only the dominant alleleE1increased the sensitivity of the photoperiod-sensitive phase of flowering duration to photoperiod singly, but positive epistatic effects were detected betweenE1andE2,E1andE3, and especially among all three dominant alleles. The increases in flowering duration resulting from the combined effects of gene and environment (i.e. photoperiod) were associated with considerable increases in biomass and seed yield at harvest maturity.Copyright 1998 Annals of Botany Company.
Glycine max(L.) Merrill, soyabean, maturity genes, flowering, photoperiod, reciprocal transfer, yield.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. V. Kumudini, P. K. Pallikonda, and C. Steele Photoperiod and E-genes Influence the Duration of the Reproductive Phase in Soybean Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1510 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Kantolic and G. A. Slafer Development and Seed Number in Indeterminate Soybean as Affected by Timing and Duration of Exposure to Long Photoperiods after Flowering Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 925 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quinet, V. Cawoy, I. Lefevre, F. Van Miegroet, A.-L. Jacquemart, and J.-M. Kinet Inflorescence structure and control of flowering time and duration by light in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2004; 55(402): 1509 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Adams, S. Pearson, and P. Hadley Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity J. Exp. Bot., April 15, 2001; 52(357): 655 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


