Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolezcaronel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Obermayer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dolezcaronel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Obermayer, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dolezcaronel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Obermayer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 82 (Supplement A): 17-26, 1998
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company

Plant Genome Size Estimation by Flow Cytometry: Inter-laboratory Comparison

J. Dolezcaronel 1, J. Greilhuber 2, S. Lucretti 3, A. Meister 4, M. A. Lysák 5, L. Nardi 3, and R. Obermayer 2

1 De Montfort University Norman Borlaug Centre for Plant Science, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
3 ENEA, Casaccia Research Centre, INN Department, Plant Biotechnology Division, Rome, Italy
4 Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany
5 De Montfort University Norman Borlaug Centre for Plant Science, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Department of Botany, Palackyacute University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Institute of Experimental Botany, Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Sokolovská 6, CZ-77200 Olomouc, Czech Republic. dolezel{at}risc.upol.cz

Flow cytometry is a convenient and rapid method that has been used extensively for estimation of nuclear genome size in plants. In contrast to general expectations, results obtained in different laboratories showed some striking discrepancies. The aim of this joint experiment was to test the reliability and reproducibility of methods. Care was taken to avoid a bias due to the quantity of DNA in the nucleus, the procedure for nuclei isolation or the type of instrument. Nuclear DNA content was estimated in nine plant species representing a typical range of genome size (2C = approx. 0·3–30 pg DNA). Each of the four laboratories involved in this study used a different buffer and/or procedure for nuclei isolation. Two laboratories used arc lamp-based instruments while the other two used laser-based instruments. The results obtained after nuclei staining with propidium iodide (a DNA intercalator) agreed well with those obtained using Feulgen densitometry. On the other hand, results obtained after staining with DAPI (binding preferentially to AT-rich regions) did not agree with those obtained using Feulgen densitometry. Small, but statistically significant, differences were found between data obtained with individual instruments. Differences between the same type of instruments were negligible, while larger differences were observed between lamp- and laser-based instruments. Ratios of fluorescence intensity obtained by laser instruments were higher than those obtained by lamp-based cytometers or by Feulgen densitometry. The results obtained in this study demonstrate that flow cytometry with DNA intercalators is a reliable method for estimation of nuclear genome size in plants. However, the study confirmed an urgent need for an agreement on standards. Given the small but systematic differences between different types of flow cytometers, analysis of very small differences in genome size should be made in the same laboratory and using the same instrument.

DAPI, Feulgen densitometry, flow cytometry, plant genome size, nuclear DNA content, propidium iodide, standardization

Submitted on November 4, 1997
Revised on April 9, 1998
Accepted on May 8, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. F.X. Mayer, S. Taudien, M. Martis, H. Simkova, P. Suchankova, H. Gundlach, T. Wicker, A. Petzold, M. Felder, B. Steuernagel, et al.
Gene Content and Virtual Gene Order of Barley Chromosome 1H
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2009; 151(2): 496 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
F. Kolar, M. Stech, P. Travnicek, J. Rauchova, T. Urfus, P. Vit, M. Kubesova, and J. Suda
Towards resolving the Knautia arvensis agg. (Dipsacaceae) puzzle: primary and secondary contact zones and ploidy segregation at landscape and microgeographic scales
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2009; 103(6): 963 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Greilhuber
Cytochemistry and C-values: The Less-well-known World of Nuclear DNA Amounts
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 791 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. J. Leitch, L. Hanson, K. Y. Lim, A. Kovarik, M. W. Chase, J. J. Clarkson, and A. R. Leitch
The Ups and Downs of Genome Size Evolution in Polyploid Species of Nicotiana (Solanaceae)
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 805 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. Smarda, P. Bures, L. Horova, B. Foggi, and G. Rossi
Genome Size and GC Content Evolution of Festuca: Ancestral Expansion and Subsequent Reduction
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 421 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Loureiro, E. Rodriguez, J. Dolezel, and C. Santos
Two New Nuclear Isolation Buffers for Plant DNA Flow Cytometry: A Test with 37 Species
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(4): 875 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Leong-Skornickova, O. Sida, V. Jarolimova, M. Sabu, T. Fer, P. Travnicek, and J. Suda
Chromosome Numbers and Genome Size Variation in Indian Species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae)
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 505 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Castro, J. Loureiro, C. Santos, M. Ater, G. Ayensa, and L. Navarro
Distribution of Flower Morphs, Ploidy Level and Sexual Reproduction of the Invasive Weed Oxalis pes-caprae in the Western Area of the Mediterranean Region
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 507 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. LOUREIRO, E. RODRIGUEZ, J. DOLEZEL, and C. SANTOS
Comparison of Four Nuclear Isolation Buffers for Plant DNA Flow Cytometry
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 679 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. SMARDA and P. BURES
Intraspecific DNA Content Variability in Festuca pallens on Different Geographical Scales and Ploidy Levels
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 665 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. PECINKA, P. SUCHANKOVA, M. A. LYSAK, B. TRAVNICEK, and J. DOLEZEL
Nuclear DNA Content Variation among Central European Koeleria Taxa
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 45 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER
Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. DOLEZEL and J. BARTOS
Plant DNA Flow Cytometry and Estimation of Nuclear Genome Size
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. C. ALBACH and J. GREILHUBER
Genome Size Variation and Evolution in Veronica
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 897 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. D. Eaton, J. Curley, R. C. Williamson, and G. Jung
Determination of the Level of Variation in Polyploidy among Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars by Means of Flow Cytometry
Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 2168 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. S. Jakob, A. Meister, and F. R. Blattner
The Considerable Genome Size Variation of Hordeum Species (Poaceae) Is Linked to Phylogeny, Life Form, Ecology, and Speciation Rates
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2004; 21(5): 860 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. SCHMUTHS, A. MEISTER, R. HORRES, and K. BACHMANN
Genome Size Variation among Accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2004; 93(3): 317 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT, I. J. LEITCH, H. J. PRICE, and J. S. JOHNSTON
Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (~100 Mb) and Drosophila (~175 Mb) Using Flow Cytometry Show Genome Size in Arabidopsis to be ~157 Mb and thus ~25 % Larger than the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Estimate of ~125 Mb
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2003; 91(5): 547 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Pedrosa, N. Sandal, J. Stougaard, D. Schweizer, and A. Bachmair
Chromosomal Map of the Model Legume Lotus japonicus
Genetics, August 1, 2002; 161(4): 1661 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. NOIROT, P. BARRE, J. LOUARN, C. DUPERRAY, and S. HAMON
Consequences of Stoichiometric Error on Nuclear DNA Content Evaluation in Coffea liberica var. dewevrei using DAPI and Propidium Iodide
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2002; 89(4): 385 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. Draper, L. A.J. Mur, G. Jenkins, G. C. Ghosh-Biswas, P. Bablak, R. Hasterok, and A. P.M. Routledge
Brachypodium distachyon. A New Model System for Functional Genomics in Grasses
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2001; 127(4): 1539 - 1555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.