1 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
A survey of genome size variation in 117 gymnosperms has found that the systematic coverage of the measurements is uneven, some families have been well sampled but others have not. There is a 14·4-fold variation in genome size within the group; the largest genome being that of Pinus lambertiana with 63·5 pg DNA/2C nucleus and the smallest, 12·96 pg DNA/2C nucleus in Metasequoia glyptostroboides. The different methods that have been used to measure genome size in gymnosperms, the choice of standards, and problems associated with the different methods are reviewed. The conflicting reports of intraspecific variation in genome size in gymnosperm species are problematic. Some appear real whereas others can be attributed to problems associated with methodology. Some studies of species show considerable uniformity of genome size over a wide geographical range whereas others find high levels of variation which may, in some cases, be correlated with geographical parameters. Possible correlations between genome size and adaptive features of gymnosperms are examined and a number of correlations are reported between genome size and growth-related parameters.
Gymnosperms, genome size, intraspecific and interspecific variation in genome size, flow cytometry, Feulgen microdensitometry, reassociation kinetics
Submitted on September 10, 1997
© 1998 Annals of Botany Company
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Gymnosperms
Revised on March 26, 1998
Accepted on May 8, 1998
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Greilhuber Cytochemistry and C-values: The Less-well-known World of Nuclear DNA Amounts Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 791 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. CAI, D. ZHANG, Z.-L. LIU, and X.-R. WANG Chromosomal Localization of 5S and 18S rDNA in Five Species of Subgenus Strobus and their Implications for Genome Evolution of Pinus Ann. Bot., May 1, 2006; 97(5): 715 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. MORGAN and M. WESTOBY The Relationship Between Nuclear DNA Content and Leaf Strategy in Seed Plants Ann. Bot., December 1, 2005; 96(7): 1321 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. GREGORY The C-value Enigma in Plants and Animals: A Review of Parallels and an Appeal for Partnership Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. LEITCH, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and M. D. BENNETT Evolution of DNA Amounts Across Land Plants (Embryophyta) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 207 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. V. Krutovsky, M. Troggio, G. R. Brown, K. D. Jermstad, and D. B. Neale Comparative Mapping in the Pinaceae Genetics, September 1, 2004; 168(1): 447 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Hietala, M. Eikenes, H. Kvaalen, H. Solheim, and C. G. Fossdal Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Monitoring Heterobasidion annosum Colonization in Norway Spruce Clones That Differ in Disease Resistance Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2003; 69(8): 4413 - 4420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Schwarz-Sommer, E. de Andrade Silva, R. Berndtgen, W.-E. Lonnig, A. Muller, I. Nindl, K. Stuber, J. Wunder, H. Saedler, T. Gubitz, et al. A Linkage Map of an F2 Hybrid Population of Antirrhinum majus and A. molle Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 699 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. MURRAY, N. FRIESEN, and J. S. HESLOP-HARRISON Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Podocarpus and Comparison with Other Gymnosperm Species Ann. Bot., April 1, 2002; 89(4): 483 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Friesen, A. Brandes, and J. S. P. Heslop-Harrison Diversity, Origin, and Distribution of Retrotransposons (gypsy and copia) in Conifers Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2001; 18(7): 1176 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



