Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BIRCH, C. P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BIRCH, C. P. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BIRCH, C. P. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 83: 713-723, 1999
© 1999 Annals of Botany Company

A New Generalized Logistic Sigmoid Growth Equation Compared with the Richards Growth Equation

COLIN P. D. BIRCH+

The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK

September 15, 1998 ; January 22, 1999 . March 3, 1999

A new sigmoid growth equation is presented for curve-fitting, analysis and simulation of growth curves. Like the logistic growth equation, it increases monotonically, with both upper and lower asymptotes. Like the Richards growth equation, it can have its maximum slope at any value between its minimum and maximum. The new sigmoid equation is unique because it always tends towards exponential growth at small sizes or low densities, unlike the Richards equation, which only has this characteristic in part of its range. The new sigmoid equation is therefore uniquely suitable for circumstances in which growth at small sizes or low densities is expected to be approximately exponential, and the maximum slope of the growth curve can be at any value. Eleven widely different sigmoid curves were constructed with an exponential form at low values, using an independent algorithm. Sets of 100 variations of sequences of 20 points along each curve were created by adding random errors. In general, the new sigmoid equation fitted the sequences of points as closely as the original curves that they were generated from. The new sigmoid equation always gave closer fits and more accurate estimates of the characteristics of the 11 original sigmoid curves than the Richards equation. The Richards equation could not estimate the maximum intrinsic rate of increase (relative growth rate) of several of the curves. Both equations tended to estimate that points of inflexion were closer to half the maximum size than was actually the case; the Richards equation underestimated asymmetry by more than the new sigmoid equation. When the two equations were compared by fitting to the example dataset that was used in the original presentation of the Richards growth equation, both equations gave good fits. The Richards equation is sometimes suitable for growth processes that may or may not be close to exponential during initial growth. The new sigmoid is more suitable when initial growth is believed to be generally close to exponential, when estimates of maximum relative growth rate are required, or for generic growth simulations.Copyright 1999 Annals of Botany Company

Asymptote,Cucumis melo,curve-fitting, exponential growth, intrinsic rate of increase, logistic equation, maximum growth rate, model, non-linear least-squares regression, numerical algorithm, point of inflexion, relative growth rate, Richards growth equation, sigmoid growth curve.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Plant EcolHome page
C. Damgaard and J. Weiner
Modeling the growth of individuals in crowded plant populations
J Plant Ecol, June 1, 2008; 1(2): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
X. YIN, J. GOUDRIAAN, E. A. LANTINGA, J. VOS, and H. J. SPIERTZ
A Flexible Sigmoid Function of Determinate Growth
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2003; 91(3): 361 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.