Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by CANNELL, M. G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by CANNELL, M. G. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by THORNLEY, J. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by CANNELL, M. G. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 85: 55-67, 2000
© 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Representation and Realism

J. H. M. THORNLEY and M. G. R. CANNELL+

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, UK

June 11, 1999 ; July 28, 1999 . September 20, 1999

This paper outlines the different ways in which plant respiration is modelled, with reference to the principles set out in Cannell and Thornley (Annals of Botany85: 55–67, 2000), first in whole-plant ‘toy’ models, then within ecosystem or crop models using the growth-maintenance paradigm, and finally representing many component processes within the Hurley Pasture (HPM) and Edinburgh Forest Models (EFM), both of which separate C and N substrates from structure. Whole-plant models can be formulated so that either maintenance or growth respiration take priority for assimilates, or so that growth respiration is the difference between total respiration and maintenance associated with the resynthesis of degraded tissues. All three schemes can be converted to dynamic models which give similar, reasonable predictions of plant growth and respiration, but all have limiting assumptions and scope. Ecosystem and crop models which use the growth-maintenance respiration paradigm without separating substrates from structure, implicitly assume that maintenance respiration is a fixed cost, uncoupled to assimilate supply, and use fixed rate coefficients chosen from a range of measured values. Separation of substrates in the HPM and EFM enables estimates to be made of respiration associated with local growth, phloem loading, ammonium and nitrate N uptake, nitrate reduction, N2fixation and other mineral ion uptake, leaving a ‘residual maintenance’ term. The latter can be explicitly related to C substrate supply. Simulated changes in grassland respiration over a season and forest respiration over a rotation show that the ratio of total respiration to gross canopy photosynthesis varies within the expected limited range, that residual maintenance accounts for 46–48% of total respiration, growth 36–42%, phloem loading 10–12% and the other components for the small remainder, with the ratios between components varying during a season or forest rotation. It is concluded that the growth-maintenance approach to respiration, extended to represent many of the component processes, has considerable merit. It can be connected to reality at many points, it gives more information, it can be examined at the level of assumptions as well as at the level of predictions, and it is open to modification as more knowledge emerges. However, currently, there are still parameters that require adjustment so that the predictions of the model are acceptable. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Respiration, photosynthesis, growth, maintenance, substrate, N uptake, mineral uptake, phloem loading, model.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. Pretzsch, R. Grote, B. Reineking, Th. Rotzer, and St. Seifert
Models for Forest Ecosystem Management: A European Perspective
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2008; 101(8): 1065 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. A. Cernusak, K. Winter, J. Aranda, B. L. Turner, and J. D. Marshall
Transpiration efficiency of a tropical pioneer tree (Ficus insipida) in relation to soil fertility
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3549 - 3566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. A. Bunce
Direct and Acclimatory Responses of Dark Respiration and Translocation to Temperature
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2007; 100(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. Genard and B. Gouble
ETHY. A Theory of Fruit Climacteric Ethylene Emission
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 531 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. KINUGASA, K. HIKOSAKA, and T. HIROSE
Respiration and Reproductive Effort in Xanthium canadense
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2005; 96(1): 81 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. M. FRANTZ, N. N. COMETTI, and B. BUGBEE
Night Temperature has a Minimal Effect on Respiration and Growth in Rapidly Growing Plants
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2004; 94(1): 155 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. D. Hansen, R. S. Criddle, B. N. Smith, and C. MacFarlane
Growth-Maintenance Component Models Are an Inaccurate Representation of Plant Respiration
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 659 - 659.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J.H.M. Thornley
Response to ""Growth-Maintenance Component Models Are an Inaccurate Representation of Plant Respiration""
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 660 - 660.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.