1 Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka 020-8550, Japan
Fax +81-(0)19-621-6177, nabe{at}iwate-u.ac.jp
Self-incompatibility in Brassica species is controlled by a single S locus with multiple alleles. Recent experimental data suggest that SLG (S locus glycoprotein) and/or SRK (S receptor kinase) are the stigmatic S determinants of self-incompatibility in Brassica. A 76-kb genomic fragment containing both SLG and SRK was isolated and characterized in the S9 haplotype of B. campestris. This fragment contains at least 14 expressed genes and three putative open reading frames (ORFs), suggesting that the S locus is embedded in a gene-rich region. Within this fragment, both anther and/or stigma-specific genes are clustered around the SLG and SRK genes. Some members of the S multigene family are also closely linked to the S locus. In this review we discuss the complex genomic structure of the S locus in Brassica species.
Anther-expressed gene, Brassica campestris (syn. rapa) L., Brassica oleracea L., gene cluster, genome structure, self-incompatibility, SLG, S locus, SRK
Submitted on July 21, 1999
© 2000 Annals of Botany Company
Genomic Organization of the SLG/SRK Region of the S Locus in Brassica Species
2 Division of Natural Science, Osaka Kyoiku University, Kashiwara 582-8582, Japan
3 Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma 630-0101, Japan
4 Research Institute of Seed Production Co., Ltd, Sendai 989-3204, Japan
Accepted on September 9, 1999
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sonneveld, K. R. Tobutt, S. P. Vaughan, and T. P. Robbins Loss of Pollen-S Function in Two Self-Compatible Selections of Prunus avium Is Associated with Deletion/Mutation of an S Haplotype-Specific F-Box Gene PLANT CELL, January 1, 2005; 17(1): 37 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Watanabe, K. Hatakeyama, Y. Takada, and K. Hinata Molecular Aspects of Self-Incompatibility in Brassica Species Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2001; 42(6): 560 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

