Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, S. C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 85 (Supplement A): 253-265, 2000
© 2000 Annals of Botany Company

The Evolution and Function of Stylar Polymorphisms in Flowering Plants

Spencer C. H. Barrett 1, Linley K. Jesson 1, and Angela M. Baker 1

1 Department of Botany, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B2

Fax +1 416-978-5878, barrett{at}botany.utoronto.ca

We recognize four major classes of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants: the heterostylous conditions distyly and tristyly, stigma-height dimorphism, and enantiostyly. These polymorphisms differ in the relative positions of sexual organs and in the number of floral morphs that occur within populations. In heterostyly, stigma and anther heights are reciprocally positioned in the two or three floral morphs; in stigma-height dimorphism the two morphs vary in style length but not anther height; whereas in enantiostyly, flowers differ in whether the style is deflected to the left- or right-side of the flower. We distinguish two forms of enantiostyly depending on whether both style orientations occur on the same plant (monomorphic enantiostyly) or on different plants (dimorphic enantiostyly). Stylar polymorphisms have originated independently in numerous animal-pollinated flowering plant families. Both heterostyly and enantiostyly involve distinct floral syndromes suggesting functional convergence in which the position of the pollinator is important for pollen dispersal and male reproductive success. The function of stigma-height dimorphism remains enigmatic although the occurrence of populations with 1:1 style-morph ratios suggest that, like heterostyly and dimorphic enantiostyly, they are maintained by disassortative mating. We interpret these sexual polymorphisms as floral designs that increase the precision of cross-pollination and reduce lost mating opportunities associated with self-interference, especially geitonogamy. A single adaptive explanation based on frequency-dependent male mating proficiency can explain the evolution and maintenance of the four stylar polymorphisms in plants.

Sexual polymorphisms, pollination, mating, heterostyly, stigma-height dimorphism, enantiostyly, pollen-stigma interference, pollen dispersal, geitonogamy

Submitted on July 21, 1999
Revised on October 15, 1999
Accepted on November 15, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. K. Conner, H. F. Sahli, and K. Karoly
Tests of adaptation: functional studies of pollen removal and estimates of natural selection on anther position in wild radish
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1547 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
S. Sun, J.-Y. Gao, W.-J. Liao, Q.-J. Li, and D.-Y. Zhang
Adaptive Significance of Flexistyly in Alpinia blepharocalyx (Zingiberaceae): A Hand-pollination Experiment
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2007; 99(4): 661 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J.-Y. GAO, P.-Y. REN, Z.-H. YANG, and Q.-J. LI
The Pollination Ecology of Paraboea rufescens (Gesneriaceae): a Buzz-pollinated Tropical Herb with Mirror-image Flowers
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2006; 97(3): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
L. S. ADLER and R. E. IRWIN
Comparison of Pollen Transfer Dynamics by Multiple Floral Visitors: Experiments with Pollen and Fluorescent Dye
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. Pauw
Inversostyly: a new stylar polymorphism in an oil-secreting plant, Hemimeris racemosa (Scrophulariaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2005; 92(11): 1878 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. R. Smyth
Morphogenesis of Flowers--Our Evolving View
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2005; 17(2): 330 - 341.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. H. MASSINGA, S. D. JOHNSON, and L. D. HARDER
Heteromorphic Incompatibility and Efficiency of Pollination in Two Distylous Pentanisia Species (Rubiaceae)
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 389 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. W. Graham and S. C. H. Barrett
Phylogenetic reconstruction of the evolution of stylar polymorphisms in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2004; 91(7): 1007 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. R. Mast, D. M. S. Feller, S. Kelso, and E. Conti
Buzz-pollinated Dodecatheon originated from within the heterostylous Primula subgenus Auriculastrum (Primulaceae): a seven-region cpDNA phylogeny and its implications for floral evolution
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 926 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. K. Jesson, J. Kang, S. L. Wagner, S. C. H. Barrett, and N. G. Dengler
The development of enantiostyly
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 183 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Arroyo, S. C. H. Barrett, R. Hidalgo, and W. W. Cole
Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2002; 89(8): 1242 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
L. K. Jesson and S. C. H. Barrett
Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 253 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.