Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bondada, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bondada, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bondada, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 86: 1143-1152, 2000
© 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Comparative Epidermal Ultrastructure of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Leaf, Bract and Capsule Wall

Bhaskar R. Bondada+ and Derrick M. Oosterhuis

Department of Science, Valencia Community College, P.O. Box 3028, Orlando, FL 32802, USA Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Altheimer Laboratory, University of Arkansas, 276 Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA

Received: 9 August 2000 ; Accepted: 21 August 2000

Cotton leaves are more physiologically active than the bract and the capsule wall of the fruiting structures. To elucidate the disparities in their physiological behaviour, epidermal cell density, stomatal index, stomatal size, trichome density and type, and epicuticular wax ultrastructure of cotton leaf, bract and capsule wall were delineated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The epidermal cells of the outer periclinal walls on both surfaces of the leaf and bract were raised and convex. Conversely, the capsule wall epidermal cells were polygonal with flat outer periclinal walls. The stomatal complex in the leaf and bract was paracytic, whereas in the capsule wall the stomatal complex was anomocytic. The adaxial and abaxial stomata of the leaf were coplanar to the epidermal surface, as opposed to the raised adaxial stomata on the bract. On the contrary, the stomata on the capsule wall surface appeared to be slightly sunken. Furthermore, the capsule wall stomata were larger than the stomata on either surface of both the leaf and the bract. The stomatal index was greater on the abaxial surfaces of the leaf and the bract (18.4 and 9.4, respectively) than their corresponding adaxial surfaces (14.4 and 4.7, respectively). Leaves had the highest stomatal index followed by the bract and the capsule wall. The indumentum consisted of glandular and nonglandular trichomes, the density of which was greater on the abaxial surfaces than on the adaxial surfaces of the leaf and bract. The capsule wall indumentum lacked nonglandular trichomes. Epicuticular wax occurred in the form of striations. However, the striation pattern varied among the organs. This study clearly illustrates morphological disparities in the epidermal features of leaf, bract and capsule wall, helping to explain their physiological divergence. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company

Gossypium hirsutum, epicuticular wax, raised stomata, scanning electron microscopy, stomatal index, trichomes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. H. Ratnayaka and D. Kincaid
Gas Exchange and Leaf Ultrastructure of Tinnevelly Senna, Cassia angustifolia, under Drought and Nitrogen Stress
Crop Sci., March 28, 2005; 45(3): 840 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. A. Rudgers, S. Y. Strauss, and J. F. Wendel
Trade-offs among anti-herbivore resistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae)
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 871 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.