Annals of Botany 88: 89-99, 2001
© 2001 Annals of Botany Company
Self-incompatibility, Inbreeding Depression and Crossing Potential in Five BrazilianPleurothallis (Orchidaceae) Species
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Caixa Postal 6109, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
Received: 3 November 2000 ; Returned for revision: 12 February 2001 . Accepted: 23 March 2001
Intra- and interspecific experimental pollinations were made to determine the mating systems and the interspecific crossing potential in individuals from 24 populations of five Pleurothallis species. Pleurothallis johannensis, P. ochreata and P. teres show weak or partial self-incompatibility while P. adamantinensis and P.fabiobarrosii are more strictly self-incompatible. We found no differences in fruit set between intra- and interpopulation intraspecific crosses, and there was no correlation between fruit set and genetic variability or inbreeding in these species. All species are interfertile and showed no correlation between genetic similarity and crossing potential. We scored fruits for seed viability and observed a strong inbreeding depression in all populations; however, there was no difference in seed viability among intrapopulation, interpopulation intraspecific and interspecific cross-pollinations. These species are pollinated by flies with a behavioural pattern that facilitates self-pollination. Self-incompatibility and inbreeding depression are apparently important in the maintenance of the unusually high levels of genetic variability found in these species. As generally observed in other orchid species, barriers to hybridization between these Pleurothallis species are at the level of pollination. Copyright 2001 Annals of Botany Company
Pleurothallis, Orchidaceae, mating system, self-incompatibility, inbreeding depression, fruit set, seed set, polyembryony, interspecific compatibility
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. I. Peter and S. D. Johnson Reproductive biology of Acrolophia cochlearis (Orchidaceae): estimating rates of cross-pollination in epidendroid orchids Ann. Bot., August 1, 2009; 104(3): 573 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Waterman and M. I. Bidartondo Deception above, deception below: linking pollination and mycorrhizal biology of orchids J. Exp. Bot., March 2, 2008; (2008) erm366v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Avila-Diaz and K. Oyama Conservation genetics of an endemic and endangered epiphytic Laelia speciosa (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2007; 94(2): 184 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. LEHNEBACH and A. W ROBERTSON Pollination Ecology of Four Epiphytic Orchids of New Zealand Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 773 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Wallace The cost of inbreeding in Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae) Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2003; 90(2): 235 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. BORBA, G. J. SHEPHERD, C. V. D. BERG, and J. SEMIR Floral and Vegetative Morphometrics of Five Pleurothallis (Orchidaceae) Species: Correlation with Taxonomy, Phylogeny, Genetic Variability and Pollination Systems Ann. Bot., August 1, 2002; 90(2): 219 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


