Annals of Botany 88: 591-596, 2001
© 2001 Annals of Botany Company
Exploring the ‘Most Effective Pollinator Principle’ with Complex Flowers: Bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO, 81224, USA Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA
Received: 4 April 2001 ; Returned for revision: 11 May 2001 . Accepted: 19 June 2001
The ‘most effective pollinator principle’ implies that floral characteristics often reflect adaptation to the pollinator that transfers the most pollen, through a combination of high rate of visitation to flowers and effective deposition of pollen during each visit. We looked for the expected positive correlation between quantity and quality of visits in Ipomopsis aggregata, whose red, tubular flowers are considered to be adapted to hummingbirds. Hummingbirds were indeed the most common floral visitors in 5 years of observation. However, long-tongued bumblebees deposited on average three-times as much outcross pollen per visit to virgin flowers, and elicited four-times as much seed production, as did hummingbirds. Hence visitors that are relatively infrequent, and unexpected given the ‘pollination syndrome’ of the plant, can be surprisingly good pollinators. One interpretation of this observation is that natural selection favours a specialized floral morphology that excludes all but a single type of visitor, but that there are constraints on achieving this outcome. An alternative is that selection favours some degree of floral generalization, but that flowers can retain features that adapt them to a particular type of pollinator in spite of this generalization. Copyright 2001 Annals of Botany Company
Bumblebees, floral evolution, hummingbirds, Ipomopsis aggregata, pollination syndromes, pollinator effectiveness, scarlet gilia, seed set, specialization, temporal variation
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Matsuki, R. Tateno, M. Shibata, and Y. Isagi Pollination efficiencies of flower-visiting insects as determined by direct genetic analysis of pollen origin Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2008; 95(8): 925 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Young, D. W. Dunning, and K. W. v. Hasseln Foraging behavior affects pollen removal and deposition in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae) Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2007; 94(7): 1267 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Fumero-Caban and E. J. Melendez-Ackerman Relative pollination effectiveness of floral visitors of Pitcairnia angustifolia (Bromeliaceae) Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2007; 94(3): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. DAR, Ma. d. C. ARIZMENDI, and A. VALIENTE-BANUET Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination of Marginatocereus marginatus (Pachycereeae: Cactaceae) in Central Mexico Ann. Bot., March 1, 2006; 97(3): 423 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. ADLER and R. E. IRWIN Comparison of Pollen Transfer Dynamics by Multiple Floral Visitors: Experiments with Pollen and Fluorescent Dye Ann. Bot., January 1, 2006; 97(1): 141 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. SANCHEZ-LAFUENTE, J. GUITIAN, M. MEDRANO, C. M. HERRERA, P. J. REY, and X. CERDA Plant Traits, Environmental Factors, and Pollinator Visitation in Winter-flowering Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 845 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|