Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claßen-Bockhoff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Claßen-Bockhoff, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Claßen-Bockhoff, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 88: 1153-1172, 2001
© 2001 Annals of Botany Company

Plant Morphology: The Historic Concepts of Wilhelm Troll, Walter Zimmermann and Agnes Arber

Regine Claßen-Bockhoff+

Institut für Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Bentzelweg 2, D-55099, Mainz, Germany

Received: 11 May 2001 ; Returned for revision: 26 June 2001 . Accepted: 14 August 2001

Recent molecular systematic and developmental genetic findings have drawn attention to plant morphology as a discipline dealing with the phenotypic appearance of plant forms. However, since different terms and conceptual frameworks have evolved over a period of more than 200 years, it is reasonable to survey the history of plant morphology; this is the first of two papers with this aim. The present paper deals with the historic concepts of Troll, Zimmermann and Arber, which are based on Goethe's morphology. Included are contrasting views of ‘unity and diversity’, ‘position and process’, and ‘morphology and phylogeny’, which, in part, are basic views of current plant morphology, phylogenetic systematics and developmental genetics. Wilhelm Troll established the ‘type concept’ and the ‘principle of variable proportions’. He has provided the most comprehensive overview of the positional relations of plant forms. Agnes Arber started from the universal dynamics of life and attempted to describe all structures as processes. She paid attention to ‘repetitive branching’, ‘differential growth’, and ‘parallelism’. As a result she has recently been rediscovered by developmental botanists. Walter Zimmermann rejected any metaphysical influence on plant form and instead called for objective procedures. He was mainly interested in phylogenetic ‘character transformation’ and the ‘reconstruction of genealogical lines’. Guided by the example of flower-like inflorescences, a future paper will deal with functional and developmental constraints influencing plant forms. Recent morphological concepts (‘trialectical’, ‘continuum’/‘fuzzy’, ‘process morphology’) will be discussed and related to current morphological and developmental genetic research. Copyright 2001 Annals of Botany Company

Plant form, plant morphology, natural philosophy, homology, phylogeny, Goethe, Troll, Arber, Zimmermann, typology, character transformation, differential growth, complementarity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio
Plant Architecture: A Dynamic, Multilevel and Comprehensive Approach to Plant Form, Structure and Ontogeny
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 375 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. Heuret, C. Meredieu, T. Coudurier, F. Courdier, and D. Barthelemy
Ontogenetic trends in the morphological features of main stem annual shoots of Pinus pinaster (Pinaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2006; 93(11): 1577 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.